Kavanaugh, Unlike Gorsuch, Stays Mum on Trump's Attacks on Federal Judges
“I've maintained I'm not going to get within three ZIP codes of a political controversy here,” Kavanaugh said. He would add: “The way we stand up is by deciding cases and controversies independently without fear or favor."
September 06, 2018 at 06:10 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh refused to comment on President Donald Trump's frequent criticisms of the federal judiciary, insisting that he would not get “within three ZIP codes” from any political controversy during the third day of his confirmation hearing.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, pressed Kavanaugh repeatedly to react to Trump's statement in 2016 that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg “embarrassed us all,” for having criticized Trump, and the 41 tweets in which he has disparaged federal judges. In a series of interviews, Ginsburg had criticized then-candidate Trump as a “faker,” which she later said was ill-advised.
Kavanaugh said Thursday that asking him to comment on the statements of others would improperly drag him into politics. “I've maintained I'm not going to get within three ZIP codes of a political controversy here,” he stated.
Speaking more generally, Kavanaugh told Blumenthal, “I've spoken about my respect and appreciation for the eight justices on the Supreme Court, the honor it would be if I were to be confirmed to be part of that team of nine with those eight people, all whom I know and I respect, and I know they're all dedicated public servants who've given a great deal to this country. I've made that clear throughout this hearing.”
Kavanaugh's reaction contrasts with the answer to a similar question Blumenthal asked of Trump's first Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, at his confirmation hearing in March 2017.
“When anyone criticizes the honesty, integrity, the motives of a federal judge, well, I find that disheartening, I find that demoralizing, because I know the truth,” Gorsuch said then.
Blumenthal asked if that included the president, and Gorsuch replied, “Anyone is anyone.”
Gorsuch had already made similar comments to Blumenthal before the hearings, and when the words “disheartening” and “demoralizing” leaked out to the news media, Trump was reportedly furious at Gorsuch's lack of loyalty, according to “The Most Dangerous Branch,” a new book by legal writer David Kaplan.
When Gorsuch was asked by his nomination guide Kelly Ayotte to “walk back” his prehearing remarks, Gorsuch said he'd “get on a plane and fly home to Colorado tonight” if the pressure continued, according to Kaplan's reporting.
Blumenthal told Kavanaugh on Thursday that “the judiciary and nominees, like yourself, have an obligation to stand up for the judiciary.”
Kavanaugh replied, “The way we stand up is by deciding cases and controversies independently without fear or favor. Beyond that, we follow the canons and the leadership of Chief Justice Roberts who is a superb leader of the American judiciary in terms of maintaining the independence of the judiciary and staying well clear of political controversy.”
Read more:
New Book Tells Inside Stories of Feuding Justices, Anger Toward Trump
Kavanaugh Touts 'Team of Nine.' Holmes Put It Like This: 'Nine Scorpions in a Bottle'
Gorsuch Scores Points by Distancing Himself From Trump
Ginsburg, in Apology, Says Her Donald Trump Remarks Were 'Ill-Advised'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRoberts Calls Court's Relationship With Congress 'Strained.' Who's to Blame?
Judicial Conference Declines Democratic Request to Refer Justice Thomas to DOJ
Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
Reported Refusal to Officiate Gay Wedding Prompts Review by NY Judicial Misconduct Watchdog
Trending Stories
- 1‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
- 2With DEI Rollbacks, Employment Lawyers See Potential For Targeting Corporate Commitment to Equality
- 3In-House Legal Network The L Suite Acquires Legal E-Learning Platform Luminate+
- 4In Police Shooting Case, Kavanaugh Bleeds Blue and Jackson ‘Very Very Confused’
- 5Trump RTO Mandates Won’t Disrupt Big Law Policies—But Client Expectations Might
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250