Big Law Steps Up to Praise Kavanaugh as Confirmation Hearing Winds Down
The testimony of lawyers who are not necessarily affiliated with advocacy groups has become common in confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
September 07, 2018 at 01:48 PM
5 minute read
Former U.S. solicitors general and other lawyers from major firms spoke out in favor of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Friday, giving him a unanimous boost on the final day of his confirmation hearing.
“We can aspire to a judiciary that will be prepared, perceptive, competent, open-minded, honest and respectful,” said former Solicitor General Theodore Olson, a partner at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. “That is the jurist that is Brett Kavanaugh. He is the kind of person and judge that we expect and deserve on the Supreme Court.”
More than once, Olson said that “I have heard nothing but the highest praise” for Kavanaugh from lawyers he comes in contact with.
The testimony of lawyers who are not necessarily affiliated with advocacy groups has become common in confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Last year, Hogan Lovells partner Neal Katyal, Alice Fisher of Latham & Watkins and Jeffrey Lamken of MoloLamken were among those testifying in favor of nominee Neil Gorsuch.
The American Bar Association, with more than 400,000 members, was also represented Friday as two lawyers from its Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary reported the committee's unanimous “well qualified” ranking of Kavanaugh, the highest rating the committee gives. Republican senators who have criticized the ABA's role in rating nominees in the past effusively thanked the committee.
As for the other lawyers who testified, Luke McCloud, an associate at Williams & Connolly who clerked for Kavanaugh and then for Supreme Court justice Sonia Sotomayor, zeroed in on Kavanaugh's efforts to recruit and mentor minorities, including himself.
“He regularly speaks to diverse law student associations to encourage their members to apply for clerkships, said McCloud, who is African-American. “The judge also actively mentors the minority students he teaches, helping them become future leaders within the law. Judge Kavanaugh's commitment to promoting the careers of minority attorneys is also apparent from his own clerk hiring. Of his 48 law clerks, 13 are racial minorities, including five African-Americans.”
Colleen Sinzdak, a former student of Kavanaugh's at Harvard Law School who is now a senior associate at Hogan Lovells, spoke to Kavanaugh's treatment of women.
“Far too often in my career, I have felt that I was being treated as female lawyer, rather than just as a lawyer,” said Sinzdak, who was part of Katyal's Hogan Lovells team that challenged President Donald Trump's travel ban policy. “But with Judge Kavanaugh, I have never felt that way. In my interactions with him, I know that I am being judged on the merits of what I say, nothing less, and nothing more.”
Paul Clement, another former SG and longtime friend of Kavanaugh, said in prepared remarks: “I am not here testifying today out of friendship. Rather, I am testifying today because of what I have seen in observing Judge Kavanaugh in his over 12 years of service on the federal appellate bench.”
Speaking from the vantage point of someone who has argued before Kavanaugh, Clement also said, “Judge Kavanaugh has judicial temperament in spades. He is respectful of counsel in both his demeanor and in his level of preparation and engagement. Nothing is more discouraging to litigants and attorneys than a cold or underprepared bench. There is no fear of that with Judge Kavanaugh.”
Maureen MahoneyMaureen Mahoney, retired partner at Latham and a former deputy solicitor general, likened Kavanaugh to Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. in her prepared remarks.
“The chief justice and Judge Kavanaugh also share a civility and evenhandedness on the bench that reflects their genuine effort to consider all sides of an argument thoroughly before reaching any conclusions. I have had the pleasure of arguing before both men,” she stated.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal, R- Connecticut, asked Olson, as he asked Kavanaugh himself, whether Trump's criticisms of the federal judiciary, including Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in the last two years should be condemned. Kavanaugh declined to do so directly, but Olson pinch hit for him, though he did not mention Trump directly.
“I deplore statements criticizing the integrity, our intelligence of members of judiciary across the board,” Olson said. “As far as Justice Ginsburg is concerned, I have to say that she is someone that I have the hugest respect for. She is a hero in this country, a warrior. She's stood for many, many great things. She argued cases in the Supreme Court that broke ground on behalf of women and on behalf all of us. And I respect her.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute read5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250