Judge Admonishes Defense, Prosecutors in Case Against Russia Agent
A Washington federal trial judge Monday issued a gag order in the conspiracy case against Maria Butina, saying the defense had "overstepped." But prosecutors didn't escape scrutiny, either.
September 10, 2018 at 03:53 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in Washington barred the defense team for an accused Russian agent from making further comments to the media, citing concerns that public statements made outside the courtroom would make it more difficult to seat a jury.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Monday said the defense lawyer, Robert Driscoll, had “overstepped” and “crossed the line” with his comments to the media, two months after she had cautioned him against trying Maria Butina's case in the press.
But the government shared some of the blame for Driscoll's comments, Chutkan said, acknowledging that the defense lawyer was driven to rebut the prosecution's claim that Butina had offered sex in exchange for a job at a special-interest organization.
In a court filing late Friday, prosecutors walked back that claim, saying they had misunderstood messages that the government has since cited in arguing that Butina should be detained while she awaits trial.
Chutkan said she was “dismayed” by the government's error but told prosecutors, “I credit you for publicly taking back those allegations.” She said it had taken her five minutes to review the messages and see that Butina's statements were jokes.
“It was apparent on their face,” Chutkan said.
Butina's defense lawyers have resisted the argument that they violated any court rules in their comments to news reporters. They defended their effort “to occasionally push back against the overwhelming onslaught of negative stories.” The case against Butina, the defense argued, has “received saturation coverage having nothing to do with statements of counsel.”
Butina is charged in Washington federal district court with conspiring against the U.S. as an undisclosed Russian agent. Prosecutors contend Butina worked at the direction of high-level Russian officials to infiltrate organizations involved in U.S. politics. She has pleaded not guilty.
“She is not a spy. She is not working on behalf of the Russian Federation or some Kremlin intelligence operation. She is not a Russian agent,” Butina's lawyers told the court last week.
Chutkan rejected Butina's renewed bid to be released pending trial. Chutkan envisioned Butina being released and then “placed into a car with diplomatic tags,” then whisked to an airport for a Russia-bound flight. Even high-intensity supervision, she said, “will not stop that.”
“There's a very real risk of flight,” Chutkan said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJay Clayton, Ex-SEC Chief and Sullivan & Cromwell Lawyer, Eyed For Manhattan US Attorney's Office
Trump Election-Interference Prosecution Appears on Course to Wind Down
4 minute read'Dismissal Required'?: Trump Cites Another Supreme Court Ruling in DC Jan. 6 Case
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250