Judge Admonishes Defense, Prosecutors in Case Against Russia Agent
A Washington federal trial judge Monday issued a gag order in the conspiracy case against Maria Butina, saying the defense had "overstepped." But prosecutors didn't escape scrutiny, either.
September 10, 2018 at 03:53 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in Washington barred the defense team for an accused Russian agent from making further comments to the media, citing concerns that public statements made outside the courtroom would make it more difficult to seat a jury.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Monday said the defense lawyer, Robert Driscoll, had “overstepped” and “crossed the line” with his comments to the media, two months after she had cautioned him against trying Maria Butina's case in the press.
But the government shared some of the blame for Driscoll's comments, Chutkan said, acknowledging that the defense lawyer was driven to rebut the prosecution's claim that Butina had offered sex in exchange for a job at a special-interest organization.
In a court filing late Friday, prosecutors walked back that claim, saying they had misunderstood messages that the government has since cited in arguing that Butina should be detained while she awaits trial.
Chutkan said she was “dismayed” by the government's error but told prosecutors, “I credit you for publicly taking back those allegations.” She said it had taken her five minutes to review the messages and see that Butina's statements were jokes.
“It was apparent on their face,” Chutkan said.
Butina's defense lawyers have resisted the argument that they violated any court rules in their comments to news reporters. They defended their effort “to occasionally push back against the overwhelming onslaught of negative stories.” The case against Butina, the defense argued, has “received saturation coverage having nothing to do with statements of counsel.”
Butina is charged in Washington federal district court with conspiring against the U.S. as an undisclosed Russian agent. Prosecutors contend Butina worked at the direction of high-level Russian officials to infiltrate organizations involved in U.S. politics. She has pleaded not guilty.
“She is not a spy. She is not working on behalf of the Russian Federation or some Kremlin intelligence operation. She is not a Russian agent,” Butina's lawyers told the court last week.
Chutkan rejected Butina's renewed bid to be released pending trial. Chutkan envisioned Butina being released and then “placed into a car with diplomatic tags,” then whisked to an airport for a Russia-bound flight. Even high-intensity supervision, she said, “will not stop that.”
“There's a very real risk of flight,” Chutkan said.
Read more:
Prosecutors Accuse Lawyer for Alleged Russian Spy of Blabbing to the Press
How Law Firms Are Protecting Sensitive Information in Russia Cases
Magistrate Judge Orders Accused Russian Agent Held Pending Trial
Russian National Charged in Conspiracy Against US
Manafort's Lawyers Say Op-Ed Did Not Violate Judge's Gag Order
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Undermines the Rule of Law’: Retired US Judges Condemn Trump’s Jan. 6 Pardons
US Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readSCOTUSblog Co-Founder Tom Goldstein Misused Law Firm Funds, According to Federal Indictment
2 minute readRead the Document: DOJ Releases Ex-Special Counsel's Report Explaining Trump Prosecutions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 2Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 3Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 4Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
- 5Cornell Tech Expands Law, Technology and Entrepreneurship Masters of Law Program to Part Time Format
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250