Debra Katz: Kavanaugh Accuser Is Willing to Testify About Misconduct Claims
"My client will do whatever is necessary to make sure that the Senate Judiciary Committee has the full story and the full set of allegations to allow them to make a fully informed decision," Debra Katz of Washington's Katz, Marshall & Banks said Monday.
September 17, 2018 at 08:35 AM
5 minute read
Updated 10:40 a.m.
Christine Blasey Ford, who alleges Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her decades ago in their high school years, is willing to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee, her lawyers said Monday.
Debra Katz, the Washington civil rights attorney and an attorney for Ford, said no one from the Senate Judiciary Committee has asked Ford to testify.
“My client will do whatever is necessary to make sure that the Senate Judiciary Committee has the full story and the full set of allegations to allow them to make a fully informed decision,” Katz, of Washington's Katz, Marshall & Banks, said on the news program “CBS This Morning.” “She's willing to do what she needs to do. She's willing, hopefully, to tell her story in a manner that is a fair proceeding.”
Some Senate Republicans are working toward arranging phone conversations with Ford and Kavanaugh, but the news that Ford is willing to testify publicly might make that option more difficult.
Debra Katz, the lawyer of Brett Kavanaugh's accuser, says her client is "willing to do what she needs to do" before the Senate Judiciary Committee as Republicans prepare to grill her over sexual misconduct allegations against the Supreme Court nominee. https://t.co/OEeVP7B0Rs pic.twitter.com/4LVctXpJoE
— CBS News (@CBSNews) September 17, 2018
Katz said Monday on CNN: “We've heard from no one. We've seen various statements made on television—statements that are being bandied about for political reasons. But no one's asked her.”
Another lawyer for Ford, Lisa Banks, also at the firm Katz, Marshall & Banks, told NPR, “She will agree to participate in any proceedings that she's asked to participate in.” She also said that Ford's recollections of the assault were “crystal clear.”
Kavanaugh said in a statement Monday:
“This is a completely false allegation. I have never done anything like what the accuser describes—to her or to anyone.
“Because this never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself yesterday.
“I am willing to talk to the Senate Judiciary Committee in any way the Committee deems appropriate to refute this false allegation, from 36 years ago, and defend my integrity.”
Ford, a Palo Alto professor, spoke publicly to The Washington Post in an interview published online Sunday. The claims—that Kavanaugh, then 17, pinned her to a bed at a party and covered her mouth—roiled the confirmation process just days before a scheduled committee vote. Kavanaugh, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, was deemed likely to be confirmed.
Kavanaugh has not publicly addressed the allegations against him. Kavanaugh's backers have pointed to many letters published in recent weeks—as part of the confirmation process—touting Kavanaugh's advocacy for women. Those letters include statements from his former female clerks, praised Kavanaugh for helping end disparities and hardships for women in the law.
Ford first made her claims against Kavanaugh in a letter to her congresswoman. That letter was later transmitted to Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, the ranking members on the Senate Judiciary Committee. Ford asked that she remain anonymous and that her claims be kept confidential.
The first public hint of the controversy came in a report at the Intercept last week that Feinstein was keeping a letter from other members of the Judiciary Committee. In aftermath of that reporting, Ford's claims would be revealed by The New Yorker.
“There was a great deal of ambivalence about whether she wanted to be publicly associated with these allegations,” Katz said Monday. “Essentially that choice was made by her to remain confidential. She asked Sen. Feinstein to keep her letter and her allegations confidential, and Feinstein agreed to do that.”
Katz said some news reporters, aware of Ford's identity, reached out in person to talk with her and emailed and called her. “She knew that her allegations were going to be outed, and that in fact is what occurred,” Katz said Monday. “As a result, she decided to take control of this to tell this in her own voice.”
Read more:
This report was updated to include Kavanaugh's statement Monday.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All3rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
2 minute readAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
Trending Stories
- 1Lawyer’s Resolutions: Focusing on 2025
- 2Houston Judge Exonerated on Appeal, Public Reprimand Vacated
- 3Bar Report - Dec. 30
- 4Employment Law Developments to Expect From the Second Trump Administration
- 5How I Made Law Firm Leadership: 'It’s Imperative That You Never Stop Learning,' Says Ian Ribald of Ballard Spahr
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250