Class Action Filed Over Deadly Gas Explosions in Massachusetts
The lawsuit is the first filed after explosions in the Merrimack Valley region that forced thousands to evacuate, injured over 20 and killed one on Sept. 13.
September 18, 2018 at 03:39 PM
5 minute read
|
Morgan & Morgan has filed the first lawsuit over damages caused by dozens of gas explosions that rocked Massachusetts last week.
The law firm filed the class action on Tuesday in Essex County Superior Court in Massachusetts on behalf of residents of the Merrimack Valley region, including the 8,600 forced to evacuate after gas line operator Columbia Gas of Massachusetts shut off their pipes. The explosions, which occurred on Sept. 13 in the towns of Andover, North Andover and Lawrence, killed one teenager and injured more than 20 others.
The lawsuit was filed by a Lawrence resident who was unable to get her dog from her home and spent the night on a stranger's floor on the evening of the gas explosions. It seeks compensation for lost property value and income, relocation costs and other monetary damages, as well as injunctive relief and punitive damages.
“Our goal is to ensure residents in these three towns have access to justice and that the company is held accountable,” said Morgan & Morgan partner Frank Petosa during a conference call with reporters on Tuesday. “What we're seeking to do is to hold both companies accountable for what happened and ensure the members of the class have access to justice and compensation for any losses they've suffered.”
Petosa, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, filed the suit along with his colleagues Rene Rocha in New Orleans and Tyler Church in Boston.
Ken Stammen, a spokesman for NiSource Inc., which owns Columbia Gas, wouldn't comment on the litigation, though he noted that the company is “fully committed to responding to the needs of people who are suffering because of this incident.” Columbia Gas previously has said it plans to replace 48 miles of cast iron and bare steel in its distribution lines with modern plastic pipes as part of a program in collaboration with the governor's office.
“This unprecedented event requires unprecedented action,” said NiSource CEO Joe Hamrock in a statement on Sunday. “We lost the trust of this community and are 100 percent committed to restoring safety, confidence and peace of mind for everyone in this community. Over time, we hope to earn back the trust we lost during this incident.”
Columbia Gas also has set up a property claims process to help pay for “evacuation expenses, food spoilage, child care costs, etc.”
Two other law firms, New York's Bragar Eagel & Squire and Los Angeles-based Glancy Prongay & Murray, are investigating potential lawsuits on behalf of shareholders of NiSource, whose stock fell on the day of the gas explosions.
The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the cause of the explosions. According to a letter sent on Monday to Columbia Gas officials from legislators including U.S. Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Edward Markey, both Democrats in Massachusetts, the pressure was 12 times higher than it should have been in the pipes.
The lawsuit brings claims of strict liability for ultra-hazardous activities and negligence, alleging that the gas distribution system was “poorly maintained, antiquated, obsolete, and highly dangerous.” It lists prior incidences involving Columbia Gas. The Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities, for instance, has fined Columbia Gas $100,000 for improper maintenance issues over several years, and, in 2012, a gas line in Springfield caused an explosion that injured 21 people. Months later, a gas line operated by another NiSource subsidiary exploded in Sissonville, West Virginia.
“This is a shock to people in the area, but it is not a surprise to Columbia Gas Co.,” Robert Kennedy Jr., a partner in Morgan & Morgan's New York office, told reporters on Tuesday. “I've been involved in litigation against Columbia all over the country.”
In the conference call, Petosa told reporters that Morgan & Morgan would be conducting its own investigation to provide “another voice” to the NTSB and other government authorities. The firm's lawyers plan to be in Lawrence on Thursday for a town hall session with public officials, Kennedy said.
The lawsuit does not seek compensation for injuries, property damages or losses to businesses, all of which could be part of future individual lawsuits, Petosa said. Lawyers said their suit sought to provide more adequate relief than a compensation fund announced on Tuesday by Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker that includes a $10 million contribution from Columbia Gas.
Kennedy said that the government, and not just Columbia Gas, was at fault in this case. He also noted that Morgan & Morgan was involved in lawsuits over the Deepwater Horizon oil spill litigation and the gas leak cases in California, both of which had similar compensation programs.
“We found there was a collaboration, a disturbing collaboration, between the regulated industry and the regulators who were supposed to protect the public,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Courts Announce Closures in Observance of Jimmy Carter National Mourning Day
2 minute readWho Got the Work: Gibson Dunn and Wilmer to Defend BlackRock in ESG Antitrust Lawsuit
2 minute readNew York Times Moves for $100K in Attorney Fees Against Dfinity Foundation
3 minute readSplit 4th Circuit Revives Constitutional Challenge to Child Vaccine Mandate
Trending Stories
- 1New York’s Proposed Legislation Restraining Transfer of Real Property
- 2Withers Hires Lawyers, Staff From LA Trusts and Estates Boutique
- 3To Speed Criminal Discovery, NY Bill Proposes Police-to-Prosecutor Pipeline For Records
- 4Merchan Rejects Trump's Bid to Delay Manhattan Sentencing
- 5High-Low Settlement Agreement 'Does Not Alone Establish Bias:' State High Court Affirms $20M Med Mal Verdict
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250