Female Clerks Stand by Kavanaugh Despite Assault Allegation
“The recent allegation is flatly inconsistent with everything I know of him," one former Kavanaugh clerk, Sarah Pitlyk, says.
September 18, 2018 at 12:06 PM
4 minute read
Brett Kavanaugh's former women law clerks who were willing to discuss the fast-moving controversy surrounding his Supreme Court nomination still support him as he prepares to defend himself before the Senate Judiciary Committee from an accusation of sexual misconduct.
Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor who accused Kavanaugh, came forward publicly to give details of the alleged sexual assault that occurred while both were in high school during the 1980s. On Monday, Kavanaugh and Ford said they were willing to testify, and the Senate Judiciary Committee scheduled a hearing for Monday, Sept. 24.
Kavanaugh, according to Ford's account, was stumbling drunk when he pinned her to a bed, groped her and covered her mouth to prevent her from screaming. Ford said she thought Kavanaugh, then 17, might inadvertently kill her. Kavanaugh has “categorically and unequivocally” denied the allegations.
“I remain fully supportive of Judge Kavanaugh's confirmation. He is a man of excellent character and excellent qualifications, and he would make an excellent Supreme Court justice,” said Caroline Edsall Littleton, a Jones Day associate in Washington who clerked for Kavanaugh in 2011 and 2012.
Another former clerk, Rebecca Taibleson, who clerked for Kavanaugh in 2010, said her “level of support has not changed at all.” Taibleson, an assistant U.S. attorney in Wisconsin, testified on his behalf before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 6 and was one of 18 of Kavanaugh's female clerks who joined in a letter supporting him on July 12.
The letter stressed “our uniformly positive experiences with the Judge as a boss on issues of gender and equality in the workplace.” Kavanaugh, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit since 2006, has made a point of his efforts to hire and mentor women and minorities as clerks since he became a circuit judge in 2006.
Seventeen of the 18 letter-signers were contacted by The National Law Journal by email or phone to ascertain their observations on the latest developments and their level of support for the judge. Seven of the signers responded. Two lawyers from private practice responded, but declined to provide an on-the-record comment.
“Judge Kavanaugh has my full support,” said Porter Wilkinson Wall, who clerked for Kavanaugh a decade ago. “He is a man of honor and the highest integrity. I am not alone in this assessment. Women from every phase of his life have written to the Senate Judiciary Committee to vouch for his character, kindness, and generosity.” She is on temporary leave from her position as an official of the Smithsonian Institution.
Jennifer Mascott, a professor at Antonin Scalia Law School who also testified before the committee, said, “As a law clerk for Judge Kavanaugh during his first year on the bench from 2006-07, I have known Judge Kavanaugh and his family for 12 years. I deeply respect and admire Judge Kavanaugh. Yes, I stand with the statement that I signed on behalf of Judge Kavanaugh.”
Former Kavanaugh clerk Sarah Pitlyk, who has known the judge for more than 10 years, said “the recent allegation is flatly inconsistent with everything I know of him.” Pitlyk, special counsel at the Thomas More Society, added: “In light of the overwhelming evidence of his integrity and good character, it is very hard to find this allegation credible, especially when it has come to light in such a transparently politically-motivated manner.”
Travis Lenkner, a Kavanaugh clerk who has helped coordinate communications among fellow clerks since Kavanaugh was nominated in July, said, “it is impossible to conceive of his having engaged in the behavior that has been alleged from 36 years ago.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy ACLU's New Legal Director Says It's a 'Good Time to Take the Reins'
8th Circuit Appeal Could Weaken Key Defense in Disability Bias Cases, Employment Lawyers Say
Michael Cohen Loses Bid for Supreme Court Review of Civil Rights Lawsuit
ACLU's Strangio Will Become First Openly Trans Attorney to Argue at Supreme Court
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250