Lawyer Who Claimed Clarence Thomas Groped Her Reflects on Personal Toll
"There was a lot of talk about believing women, about the progress we've made, but when the stakes are high enough, we're still willing to ignore their voices or shout them down," Moira Smith says in an op-ed.
September 22, 2018 at 01:56 PM
5 minute read
The Alaskan lawyer who claimed Justice Clarence Thomas groped her at a social event in the 1990s on Saturday reflected on the personal toll that comes with publicly accusing powerful men of misconduct and questioned whether speaking out was worth the anguish.
In an opinion article in the Anchorage Daily News, the lawyer, Moira Smith, revisited her experience in 2016 when she accused Thomas of inappropriately touching her at a dinner party in Virginia in 1999. The National Law Journal first published Smith's claims. Thomas, who called Smith's claim “preposterous,” denied any misconduct.
“My darkest moment came in Alaska's darkest season. Up in the early hours, alone with my own thoughts, I realized I'd been naïve. Other than the stark denials from Justice Thomas's defenders, nothing happened, ” Smith wrote in her op-ed. “ There was a lot of talk about believing women, about the progress we've made, but when the stakes are high enough, we're still willing to ignore their voices or shout them down.”
Smith, vice president and general counsel to Enstar Gas Co., said she shares an “unfortunate fate” with Anita Hill and now with Christine Blasey Ford, the California professor who has claimed U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her at a party in suburban Washington during their high school years.
“Reluctantly, and at a personal cost, we have all accused a sitting or prospective U.S. Supreme Court justice of sexual misconduct. The question we and other women who have accused powerful men carry, quietly, is whether it was worth it,” Smith wrote in her op-ed. Smith said she was approached by the Alaska paper to write about her reflections on her speaking out against Thomas.
Kavanaugh has insisted he did not sexually assault Ford or any other woman. The nominee, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, has agreed to testify next week at his re-opened confirmation hearing. Ford's lawyers were negotiating the possibility she, too, would testify.
Ford first aired her claims against Kavanaugh in a Washington Post story published on Sept. 16. The Post said Ford debated whether to come forward with her allegations. “Why suffer through the annihilation if it's not going to matter?” Ford told the Post.
In her opinion article, Smith said she struggled with whether to speak with The National Law Journal in 2016 about her claims, which she first made in a Facebook post. That post, which the NLJ saw, identified Thomas by name. Smith, a former Truman Foundation scholar, was attending a dinner party at a private home in Virginia when she claimed Thomas groped her.
“I knew that as soon as I did, the most interesting thing about me would be the thing I'd like most to forget,” Smith wrote in her op-ed. “I would lose the quiet dignity of my family and professional life, even in a place as far away as Alaska. I suspected, though I did not fully understand, Justice Thomas's defenders would be swift, ruthless and prepared.”
Smith said she decided to come forward despite her concerns about how airing her claims would disrupt her life.
“I have a young daughter and a young son. I wanted to play a tiny role in changing how these matters were handled when they get older. And I spoke up because of who my accused is; the nation deserved to know,” Smith wrote.
Smith did not have eyewitnesses. Smith said she did tell several friends at the time about the incident, and the NLJ contacted those friends, who confirmed that Smith had talked with them about what she said happened.
After the NLJ article was published, Smith said, she focused on her job and her family. She said the commentary about her claims—that she lied or that she had political motivations—”worked their way into my heart and brain. I'd unquestionably experienced what happened. But I wouldn't be believed.”
Ultimately, her Facebook post may have had the greatest impact, according to Smith. Countless close friends and acquaintances in her community, Smith said, told her their own stories, and some took the additional step of reporting to the authorities. Smith said she was encouraged by the spread of the #MeToo movement.
“In my more optimistic moments, I like to think that my contribution to this conversation might have pushed it forward in some small way. But, now, as the country is faced with the important question of whether to believe Ford, a woman who is risking her privacy, credibility, career, and even personal safety, I find myself thinking of what this must be like for her personally,” Smith wrote. “I wonder if, in her darker moments, she regrets it. Because I still ask myself if it was worth it for me. And, to be honest, I'm not sure.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
4 minute readMiles & Stockbridge to Combine With DC-Based Real Estate Finance Firm
4 minute read'Possible Harm'?: Winston & Strawn Will Appeal Unfavorable Ruling in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Climate Groups Demonstrate Outside A&O Shearman and Akin London Offices
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-59
- 3The American Lawyer Names Industry Award Winners
- 4Regulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
- 5Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250