3 Things Kavanaugh Didn't Want to Talk About in Fox News Interview
"I just want an opportunity, a fair process where I can defend my integrity," said Kavanaugh, responding to a question about where he thought the claims from the women were coming from.
September 24, 2018 at 08:22 PM
5 minute read
In a rare, if not unprecedented, television interview with a Supreme Court nominee, Judge Brett Kavanaugh told Fox News on Monday night that none of his alleged sexual misconduct with women happened and that all he wants is a “fair process” when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday.
“I'm not going anywhere,” Kavanaugh declared in an interview with Fox News host Martha MacCallum, who had asked him whether he considered withdrawing from the nomination because of the sexual misconduct allegations. Those claims, now from two women, arose after Kavanaugh's first round of confirmation hearings earlier in September.
Christine Blasey Ford, now a professor in California, alleges that Kavanaugh, as a high school student during the 1980s in suburban Washington, pinned her to a bed at a party, tried to pull her clothing off and covered her mouth to stop her from screaming. Another woman, Deborah Ramirez, claims Kavanaugh, as a Yale University undergraduate, exposed himself to her.
“I'm not going to let false accusations drive us out of this process,” Kavanaugh said Monday night. “And we're looking for a fair process where I can be heard and defend my integrity, my lifelong record of promoting dignity and equality, starting with the women who knew me when I was 14 years old.”
Kavanaugh appeared on the verge of tears at times during the Fox interview. And the spectacle of a Supreme Court nominee being asked if he was a virgin during high school and college bordered on the surreal. His answer was, “Many years after. I'll leave it at that. Many years after.”
Asked if he expects President Donald Trump to support him in the next, possibly most difficult, phase of his confirmation proceeding, Kavanaugh said, “I know he's going to stand by me. He called me this afternoon, and he said he's standing by me.”
But Kavanaugh declined to comment on several subjects, or deflected, instead repeating his desire for a “fair process.” His reaction to detailed questions may be a forecast of how he will respond on Thursday, when he and Ford will testify separately before a national audience.
1. Kavanaugh was asked twice where he thought the claims from the women were coming from. President Trump on Monday declared the allegations were “political.” MacCallum asked Kavanaugh at one point: “You don't want to talk about where you think this is coming from?” Kavanaugh's response: “I just want an opportunity, a fair process where I can defend my integrity.”
2. Why not let the FBI be a part of the process? Asked if an FBI investigation of the allegations might be useful to “sort it all out,” Kavanaugh sidestepped the question and said, “I was first interviewed last Monday, the day after the allegation appeared, by the committee staff under penalty of felony, and I denied this categorically and unequivocally and I said twice during that, I said, 'I want a hearing tomorrow,' last Tuesday, a week ago.”
3. Kavanaugh didn't get into any detail about drinking at the various parties he attended. Ford alleged Kavanaugh and a friend were “stumbling drunk” at the time of the alleged assault. He denied being at the party Ford described but did say he attended parties in high school. “The drinking age was 18, and yes, the seniors were legal and had beer there,” Kavanaugh told MacCallum. “And yes, people might have had too many beers on occasion and people generally in high school—I think all of us have probably done things we look back on in high school and regret or cringe a bit, but that's not what we're talking about. We're talking about an allegation of sexual assault.”
Meanwhile, attorneys for Ford, in a letter Monday to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, challenged the chairman's assurances that their client would receive a “fair and credible process” based on floor statements Monday by Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, who called the allegations against Kavanaugh part of a “smear campaign.”
Bromwich also took aim at Grassley's hiring of an “unnamed 'experienced sex crimes prosecutor'” to conduct questioning of Kavanaugh and Ford during Thursday's hearing. Senate judiciary leaders late Monday had not revealed the lawyer's identity.
The hiring of an outside lawyer, Bromwich wrote, is “contrary to the majority's repeated emphasis on the need for the Senate and this Committee's members to fulfill their constitutional obligations. It is also inconsistent with your stated wish to avoid a 'circus,' as well as Dr. Blasey Ford's repeated requests through counsel that senators conduct the questioning.” Bromwich said the hearing is not a criminal trial. The goal of the hearing, Bromwich said, “should be to develop the relevant facts, not try a case.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘Really Deflating’: Judges React to Biden Threat to Veto New Judgeships Bill
Justices Consider Scope of Corporate Remedies for Trademark Infringement
Albertsons Gives Up on $25B Merger, Sues Kroger Seeking 'Billions of Dollars'
Trending Stories
- 1City Bar Presents Thomas E. Dewey Awards to Outstanding NYC Prosecutors
- 2NC Solicitor General Park Withdraws His 4th Circuit Nomination
- 3Trump-Appointed Judge Presides Over NASCAR Antitrust Dispute Under Case Reassignment
- 4CFPB Orders Big Banks to Limit Overdraft Fees to $5. But Will Its Edict Stick?
- 5FIFA Faces Legal Challenge Over Winning Saudi World Cup Bid
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250