Yale Law Students Protest Kavanaugh on Campus and in Washington
More than 100 Yale law students traveled to Washington Monday to meet with senators and show support for Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford.
September 24, 2018 at 12:18 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
|
The discord at Yale Law School over alum Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court ratcheted up Monday when hundreds of students protested at a campus sit-in Monday.
At the same time, more than 100 others traveled to Washington, D.C., to call on the Senate to oppose his confirmation and for fair and respectful treatment of Christine Blasey Ford when it hears her testimony, currently scheduled for Thursday.
The dual actions were organized by a group called Yale Law Students Demanding Better. Organizer Veronica Guerrero said that more than half of the elite law school's 600 students were involved in some way, and that they recognize the weight that the Yale Law name carries in legal and political circles.
“Anita Hill is a Yale Law School alum. Clarence Thomas is a Yale Law School alum,” she said Monday morning as she waited with fellow students outside the office of Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse in hopes of speaking with him and other Republican lawmakers. “It's not lost on us that our law school is a part of a broader power structure where a small group of wealthy and well-connected have the power to shape the law, the legal community, and its culture. We're here to demand that the law does not marginalize groups that are already marginalized in broader society.”
The coordinated protests were also intended to send a strong message that Yale Law School does not support Kavanaugh's nomination, she added. Relatively little previous action had created the impression that the law school stands behind Kavanaugh, Guerrero said, but the fact that hundreds either left classes for the sit-in or traveled to Washington signals otherwise.
Guerrero also pointed to a letter that nearly 50 Yale law faculty sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee Sept. 21 calling on it to delay a confirmation vote and fully investigation Christine Blasey Ford's allegation that Kavanaugh attempted to rape her at a high school party in the early 1980s. That letter came before news broke Sunday that a second woman, Deborah Ramirez, alleged Kavanaugh thrust his penis into her face while at a beer-soaked party at Yale in the 1983 or 1984, when both were undergraduates there. (Several prominent Yale law professors wrote earlier op-eds in support of Kavanaugh.)
Yale Law Dean Heather Gerken said in a statement Monday that the allegations against Kavanaugh have caused “deep concern” at the school.
“Students have worked with the Law School administration and faculty so that the community can come together as a whole to discuss this important moment in our country's history,” she wrote. “As dean, I cannot take a position on the nomination, but I am so proud of the work our community is doing to engage with these issues, and I stand with them in supporting the importance of fair process, the rule of law, and the integrity of the legal system.”
The Yale law students in Washington began Monday on the steps of the Supreme Court, where they heard testimony from survivors of sexual assault. Next, they moved to Senate offices in hopes of speaking to lawmakers and airing their concerns.
“Our message is that we're here to support Dr. Ford and Debbie Ramirez, who have the right to be heard,” Guerrero said. “We think it's important that survivors or sexual assault and harassment are heard, particularly the most vulnerable members of our population.”
Not only is Kavanaugh an alum of the law school, but he frequently hires judicial clerks from there. Professor Amy Chua, who has publicly supported Kavanaugh, allegedly counseled female students that the judge prefers conventionally attractive female clerks. Chua on Sept. 22 issued a statements denying that she suggested female students look a certain way for interviews with Kavanaugh.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250