Kavanaugh Angrily Calls Sexual Assault Claims a 'Political Hit'
"You may defeat me in the final vote but you'll never get to me to quit," Kavanaugh said Thursday.
September 27, 2018 at 03:41 PM
5 minute read
U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, appearing angry and raising his voice, on Thursday rebuffed allegations that he sexually assaulted a teenager decades ago in a drunken stupor, saying Democrats pushed the claims as part of a last-minute attempt to “blow me up and take me down.”
Kavanaugh, testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, called the sexual assault allegations a “political hit” by the left to derail his likely confirmation to the Supreme Court. “This has destroyed my family and my good name,” he declared in an opening statement. At times, he fought back tears.
“This confirmation process has become a national disgrace. You have replaced advice and content with search and destroy,” Kavanaugh said. He said he would not be “intimidated” into withdrawing his nomination. “You may defeat me in the final vote but you'll never get to me to quit,” Kavanaugh said.
Kavanaugh said he would not question claims from Christine Blasey Ford that she was sexually assaulted at some point in her life. But he denied being her attacker. “I have never done anything like this. I am innocent of this charge,” he said. Kavanaugh, repeatedly fighting back tears, said all of the people Ford said were at the suburban Washington party where the assault allegedly occurred have denied being there.
Ford has accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during a summer party in 1982 when they were in high school. Ford alleges she was pushed into a bedroom and onto a bed where Kavanaugh, on top of her, groped her and tried to remove her clothes. When she tried to scream, she testified Thursday, he put his hand over her mouth. Ford said she only escaped when Kavanaugh's friend, Mark Judge, jumped on them, propelling them off the bed, which allowed her to get out of the room.
Ford, testifying for nearly four hours before Kavanaugh, sometimes in a quavering voice, sometimes tearful, left the committee with two particularly strong moments. First, she said she was “100 percent” certain that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her.
When Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, asked what was her strongest memory of the alleged assault, Ford replied, “The uproarious laughter between the two and their having fun at my expense.” Judge has denied any recollection of the alleged attack. “They were laughing with each other,” Ford testified.
Ford, a research psychologist in California, sometimes used the language of how memory is implanted on the brain to explain the clarity of her memories of the alleged assault under questioning by committee members and Rachel Mitchell, an Arizona sex-crimes prosecutor hired by Senate Republicans to question Ford on their behalf. Ford appeared with her lawyers Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich, who said they are serving pro bono.
Mitchell used her questions to probe the accuracy of Ford's memory of the alleged sexual assault. She also attempted to uncover whether anyone, besides her lawyers, had been advising her or encouraging her to come forward.
Mitchell, playing both prosecutor and defense lawyer, at one point probed Ford about who paid for a polygraph test that she took in recent weeks. Katz. of Washington's Katz Marshall & Banks, sitting next to Ford, leaned in to the microphone, telling Mitchell she'd put an end to the questioning: Ford's lawyers paid for the polygraph. Bromwich asserted moments later: “As is routine.”
Democrats on the committee repeatedly praised Ford for her courage in stepping forward with her allegation. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, echoing some of his Democratic colleagues, told Ford he believed her because of her consistent statements, her request for an FBI investigation, her polygraph test and her urging for other witnesses to be called to testify.
“Also you have been very honest about what you cannot remember,” Blumenthal said. He added: “Someone composing a story can make it come all together in a seamless way. But someone who is honest is also candid about what she or he cannot remember.”
Ford said she came forward with claims out of a sense of “civic duty.” The judiciary committee has scheduled a vote on Kavanaugh's nomination on Friday.
Read more:
Federal Judge Who Dated Kavanaugh Defends Character, Dismisses Anonymous Tip
Arizona Lawyer, Pinch-Hitting in Kavanaugh Hearing, Plays Prosecutor and Defense
'Uproarious Laughter' Haunts Ford From Alleged Kavanaugh Attack
Read Christine Blasey Ford's Prepared Statement for Kavanaugh Hearing
Nearly 2,000 Female Lawyers Voice Support for Christine Blasey Ford
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250