Kavanaugh Angrily Calls Sexual Assault Claims a 'Political Hit'
"You may defeat me in the final vote but you'll never get to me to quit," Kavanaugh said Thursday.
September 27, 2018 at 03:41 PM
5 minute read
U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, appearing angry and raising his voice, on Thursday rebuffed allegations that he sexually assaulted a teenager decades ago in a drunken stupor, saying Democrats pushed the claims as part of a last-minute attempt to “blow me up and take me down.”
Kavanaugh, testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, called the sexual assault allegations a “political hit” by the left to derail his likely confirmation to the Supreme Court. “This has destroyed my family and my good name,” he declared in an opening statement. At times, he fought back tears.
“This confirmation process has become a national disgrace. You have replaced advice and content with search and destroy,” Kavanaugh said. He said he would not be “intimidated” into withdrawing his nomination. “You may defeat me in the final vote but you'll never get to me to quit,” Kavanaugh said.
Kavanaugh said he would not question claims from Christine Blasey Ford that she was sexually assaulted at some point in her life. But he denied being her attacker. “I have never done anything like this. I am innocent of this charge,” he said. Kavanaugh, repeatedly fighting back tears, said all of the people Ford said were at the suburban Washington party where the assault allegedly occurred have denied being there.
Ford has accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her during a summer party in 1982 when they were in high school. Ford alleges she was pushed into a bedroom and onto a bed where Kavanaugh, on top of her, groped her and tried to remove her clothes. When she tried to scream, she testified Thursday, he put his hand over her mouth. Ford said she only escaped when Kavanaugh's friend, Mark Judge, jumped on them, propelling them off the bed, which allowed her to get out of the room.
Ford, testifying for nearly four hours before Kavanaugh, sometimes in a quavering voice, sometimes tearful, left the committee with two particularly strong moments. First, she said she was “100 percent” certain that Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her.
When Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, asked what was her strongest memory of the alleged assault, Ford replied, “The uproarious laughter between the two and their having fun at my expense.” Judge has denied any recollection of the alleged attack. “They were laughing with each other,” Ford testified.
Ford, a research psychologist in California, sometimes used the language of how memory is implanted on the brain to explain the clarity of her memories of the alleged assault under questioning by committee members and Rachel Mitchell, an Arizona sex-crimes prosecutor hired by Senate Republicans to question Ford on their behalf. Ford appeared with her lawyers Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich, who said they are serving pro bono.
Mitchell used her questions to probe the accuracy of Ford's memory of the alleged sexual assault. She also attempted to uncover whether anyone, besides her lawyers, had been advising her or encouraging her to come forward.
Mitchell, playing both prosecutor and defense lawyer, at one point probed Ford about who paid for a polygraph test that she took in recent weeks. Katz. of Washington's Katz Marshall & Banks, sitting next to Ford, leaned in to the microphone, telling Mitchell she'd put an end to the questioning: Ford's lawyers paid for the polygraph. Bromwich asserted moments later: “As is routine.”
Democrats on the committee repeatedly praised Ford for her courage in stepping forward with her allegation. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, echoing some of his Democratic colleagues, told Ford he believed her because of her consistent statements, her request for an FBI investigation, her polygraph test and her urging for other witnesses to be called to testify.
“Also you have been very honest about what you cannot remember,” Blumenthal said. He added: “Someone composing a story can make it come all together in a seamless way. But someone who is honest is also candid about what she or he cannot remember.”
Ford said she came forward with claims out of a sense of “civic duty.” The judiciary committee has scheduled a vote on Kavanaugh's nomination on Friday.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250