'Uproarious Laughter' Haunts Ford From Alleged Kavanaugh Attack
Christine Blasey Ford testified Thursday she is "100 percent certain" Brett Kavanaugh, the Trump administration's nominee to the Supreme Court, sexually assaulted her at a house during their teenage years.
September 27, 2018 at 11:58 AM
3 minute read
Updated 1:46 p.m.
Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of a sexual assault when they were high school students, told a U.S. Senate committee on Thursday that she was “100 percent” certain that the nominee sexually assaulted her at a social gathering in suburban Washington in the 1980s.
In a quavering, often emotional recounting of the alleged assault, Ford said her strongest memory was the “uproarious laughter between the two and their having fun at my expense.” Ford contends Kavanaugh attacked her in a room, where a friend, Mark Judge, was also present. Judge has denied any recollection of the alleged attack. “They were laughing with each other,” Ford testified Thursday.
Arizona Lawyer, Pinch-Hitting in Kavanaugh Hearing, Plays Prosecutor and Defense
During the hearing, Ford, a research psychologist in California, sometimes used the language of how memory is implanted on the brain to explain the clarity of her memories under questioning by members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Rachel Mitchell, an Arizona sex crimes prosecutor who was hired by Republican senators to conduct questioning on their behalf. Ford appeared with her lawyers Debra Katz and Michael Bromwich, who said they are serving pro bono.
Mitchell has used her questions to probe the accuracy of Ford's memory of the alleged sexual assault. Democrats on the committee have said Ford's recollection of the incident has been consistent, and that she had nothing to gain by bringing forward her claims against Kavanaugh. Ford said she came forward with claims out of a sense of “civic duty.”
Mitchell at one point probed Ford about who paid for a polygraph test that she took in recent weeks.
Katz of Washington's Katz Marshall & Banks, sitting next to Ford, leaned in to the microphone, telling Mitchell she'd put an end to the questioning: Ford's lawyers paid for the polygraph. Bromwich asserted moments later: “As is routine.”
Kavanaugh, who sits on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, has adamantly denied the alleged sexual assault. Kavanaugh is scheduled to testify later today.
Before Ford's testimony began, committee chairman Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, continued to spar over whether the majority should have asked for an FBI investigation into Ford's allegations and claims by two other women who came forward this week with sexual misconduct allegations involving Kavanaugh.
The judiciary committee has scheduled a vote on Kavanaugh's nomination on Friday.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
SEC Obtained Record $8.2 Billion in Financial Remedies for Fiscal Year 2024, Commission Says
SEC Targets Rising Crypto Financier in $115 Million Securities Fraud
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Matt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
- 2The Essential Role of Partnership Agreements in Health Care Private Practices
- 3State Law Falls Short on Disability Rights
- 4People in the News—Nov. 26, 2024—Barley Snyder, McNees
- 5Akin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250