Kavanaugh Classmate Mark Judge Willing to Cooperate With FBI, His Lawyer Says
“If the FBI or any law enforcement agency requests Mr. Judge's cooperation, he will answer any and all questions posed to him,” said Barbara "Biz" Van Gelder, an attorney for Mark Judge, a former classmate and friend of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh.
September 28, 2018 at 04:27 PM
4 minute read
Updated at 6:50 p.m.
An attorney for Mark Judge, a former classmate and high school friend of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, said Friday that Judge was willing to cooperate with a law enforcement investigation focused on allegations of sexual misconduct.
“If the FBI or any law enforcement agency requests Mr. Judge's cooperation, he will answer any and all questions posed to him,” Barbara “Biz” Van Gelder, Washington-based senior counsel at Cozen O'Connor, said Friday.
The development came shortly after Republican senators called on the FBI to reopen a limited background check into Kavanaugh, in the wake of a dramatic hearing in which Dr. Christine Blasey Ford detailed the allegation that she was sexually assaulted by Kavanaugh decades ago when they were high school students in suburban Washington. The decision hits the pause button on consideration of the nomination by the full Senate.
On Friday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said the committee will request that the Trump administration “instruct the FBI to conduct a supplemental FBI background investigation with respect to” Kavanaugh's nomination.
President Donald Trump, in a statement relayed by White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, said, “I've ordered the FBI to conduct a supplemental investigation to update Judge Kavanaugh's file. As the Senate has requested, this update must be limited in scope and completed in less than one week.”
The supplementary investigation hits the pause button on consideration of the nomination of Kavanaugh, a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Kavanaugh, responding to the decision to open the supplemental FBI probe, said in a statement:
“Throughout this process, I've been interviewed by the FBI, I've done a number of 'background' calls directly with the Senate, and yesterday, I answered questions under oath about every topic the Senators and their counsel asked me. I've done everything they have requested and will continue to cooperate.”
Senate Democrats have called on the FBI to reopen the inquiry, in part to obtain the testimony of Judge. Ford testified to senators on Thursday that Judge was the only other person present in the room during Kavanaugh's alleged assault of Ford.
On Thursday, Kavanaugh described Judge as “a friend at Georgetown Prep, starting in ninth grade.” He noted, “I haven't talked to him in a couple years.”
Judge, in a Sept. 18 statement his lawyer sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he had “no memory of the alleged incident.”
On Friday, an attorney for Patrick “PJ” Smyth, another Kavanaugh high school classmate, said he would cooperate with the FBI. Ford says that Smyth attended the social gathering where the alleged incident occurred.
“My client, Patrick J. Smyth, is happy to cooperate fully with this FBI investigation,” Eric Bruce of Kobre & Kim said in a statement.
This week, Washington, D.C., resident Julie Swetnick came forth with a separate allegation in an affidavit, accusing Judge and Kavanaugh of being present during an incident where she says she was gang-raped.
Judge flatly denied the allegations by Swetnick, in a letter Friday to the Senate Judiciary Committee, obtained by The National Law Journal.
“The allegations in the Swetnick affidavit are so bizarre that, even while suffering from my addiction, I would remember actions so outlandish. I categorically deny them,” he said, submitting the letter under penalty of perjury.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute read5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250