Kavanaugh May Face Recusal Dilemmas If He's Confirmed
Entities that Brett Kavanaugh has attacked. Organizations that opposed Kavanaugh's nomination. Issues Kavanaugh has expressed opinions about. There are a host of areas that could pose recusal problems if the nominee is confirmed.
October 02, 2018 at 10:25 AM
5 minute read
In the wake of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's angry testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, some commentators are predicting that if confirmed, he may face calls for recusal in a range of cases, including those that involve entities he lashed out at.
His comments “disqualify him from participating in a wide range of the cases that may come before the Supreme Court,” Harvard Law School professor Laurence Tribe wrote in a New York Times opinion piece Monday. “The judge himself has unwittingly provided the most compelling argument against his elevation to that court.”
Also on Monday, Politico's Playbook wondered in print, “Kavanaugh believes he was the subject of a campaign by the Clintons to discredit him, and he criticized the media and the Senate. Won't he have to bow out of any case that has to do with partisan politics, or the press?”
The short answer: probably not.
Here is a rundown of four categories of cases that have been mentioned as recusal triggers for Kavanaugh:
➤➤ Entities that Kavanaugh has attacked: In his heated comments Thursday, Kavanaugh asserted the new scrutiny on his alleged sexual misconduct is the fault of Senate Democrats and “has been a calculated and orchestrated political hit, fueled with apparent pent-up anger about President Trump and the 2016 election … revenge on behalf of the Clintons, and millions of dollars in money from outside left-wing opposition groups.” Would he have to recuse himself in cases involving those adversaries? Probably not, though he might be urged to do so in cases involving specific parties he named, such as the Clintons or the Democratic Party. But even in those cases, recusal would not be a sure thing. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, after all, didn't recuse herself in cases in which President Donald Trump is a named party, even though Ginsburg publicly and specifically criticized Trump during the 2016 campaign.
➤➤ Organizations that opposed Kavanaugh's nomination: The American Civil Liberties Union, a frequent litigant before the Supreme Court, took the rare step on Saturday of opposing Kavanaugh's confirmation, supplemented by television ads lumping him together with Bill Cosby and others accused of abusing women. Does that mean Kavanaugh would or should recuse himself in ACLU cases?
Some justices have recused themselves in cases brought by individuals who testified against them. After his 1986 confirmation hearings, the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist recused in several cases filed by James Brosnahan of Morrison & Foerster, who testified against him as a nominee. Justice Clarence Thomas recused in cases handled by the late William Moffitt, who testified against him on behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. While the justices did not explain their actions, neither Brosnahan nor Moffitt at the time could think of any other reason for recusal.
Hofstra University law professor James Sample, an expert on recusals, said that in such cases, “for a transitional period, recusal might be properly erring on the side of respect for appearances.” But in the long term, he said, that practice could invite parties to “game the system” by opposing a nominee with the goal of forcing him or her off their cases.
➤➤ Issues Kavanaugh has expressed opinions about: Because of his stated views on executive power and on other issues that might relate to whatever emerges from the Russia probe, some have said Kavanaugh should pledge to recuse himself in cases that raise those issues. Tribe even suggested that in light of the recent allegations, Kavanaugh should perhaps recuse himself from “any case involving sexual assault or harassment.” But again, such recusals would be unlikely unless Kavanaugh criticized a specific lower court decision that ended up before the Supreme Court. In 2003, the late Justice Antonin Scalia recused himself in Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, which challenged the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, but only because, in a public appearance, he had made it clear that he did not like the lower court opinion in the case.
➤➤ Cases that Kavanaugh participated in as a D.C. Circuit judge: This is the category likely to produce the most Kavanaugh recusals. In his 12 years on the D.C. Circuit, Kavanaugh has ruled on cases that have been or will be appealed to the Supreme Court. Issues ranging from religious discrimination to the Obama-era Clean Power Plan and appeals by Guantanamo detainees could face him quickly after he joins the court. The federal judicial code of conduct calls on judges not to rule on cases they participated in earlier as a judge.
Supreme Court justices are not obliged to adhere to the code, though they usually do. If Kavanaugh is confirmed, Sample said, he would be bestowed with “one of the many profound perks of the Supreme Court—the perk of judging his own impartiality without review.”
Read more:
Kavanaugh Won't Teach at Harvard, After Students Protest
Justices Thomas and Ginsburg Now Flank Roberts on 8-Justice Bench
SCOTUS: Six Cases to Watch This Term
From 'He Is Innocent' to 'She Was Authentic,' Kavanaugh Hearings Divide Attorneys
Senators to Ford: Cui Bono? Bromwich to Senate: It's Pro Bono
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBrownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readWeil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
3 minute readFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readSupreme Court Will Hear Religious Parents' Bid to Opt Out of LGBTQ-Themed School Books
Trending Stories
- 1White & Case KOs Claims Against Voltage Inc. in Solar Companies' Trade Dispute
- 2Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 3Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 4Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 5Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.