Justice Kavanaugh May Find Rough Start With New Colleagues
Brett Kavanaugh will arrive at the U.S. Supreme Court this week following a contentious confirmation, where his credibility and neutrality were questioned. How will the justices receive their newest associate? We look back at the reception of Justice Clarence Thomas.
October 07, 2018 at 11:22 AM
5 minute read
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas recently reflected on his confirmation ordeal and said that “after going through all those difficulties, the members of the court were just wonderful people to a person.”
But others tell a different story that may foreshadow how Justice Brett Kavanaugh will be received when he joins his new colleagues in the wake of a similarly explosive confirmation process.
Justice Harry Blackmun “gave him a frosty reception at first,” according to “Supreme Conflict,” a 2007 book by Jan Crawford about the court. Thomas also felt that Justice Anthony Kennedy was “talking down to him” and was “off-putting.” Blackmun and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor thought Thomas should be “more deferential to his senior colleagues,” according to Crawford.
Liberal law clerks, Crawford wrote, viewed Thomas with “ill-disguised contempt.” They called Christopher Landau, one of Thomas's clerks, “justice,” implying that Landau, not Thomas, was “running the show.” Landau is now a partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and a veteran Supreme Court advocate.
Legal Speak pod: Paul Clement Is Stoked for Brett Kavanaugh and the Term Ahead
The fact that Thomas and his wife, Virginia, sat for a People magazine interview that was published on his first day on the bench “didn't help Thomas's cause with his new colleagues,” Crawford wrote.
But Thurgood Marshall, the liberal justice Thomas replaced, was friendlier according to the book, telling Thomas, “I had to do what I had to do in my time. You have to do what you have to do in your time.”
Over time, other justices got along with Thomas, to the point where Justice Elena Kagan said, “I love Justice Thomas” in 2013. He is popular not only among his colleagues but also with court employees.
If nothing else, that shift reflects the reality that justices are keenly aware of: They will be working with their colleagues for years or decades, so there is no profit in bearing grudges.
“I think the justices care very much about collegiality and not purely for the sake of collegiality. They think it's important for people who disagree with each other to work together,” Carolyn Shapiro, co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at Chicago-Kent College of Law, told Reuters.
Kavanaugh's confirmation statements—railed on Democrats, and saying claims of sexual misconduct against him arose as part of an “orchestrated” hit by liberals—drew criticism from liberals and conservatives alike. And his remarks—which he walked back in part in a Wall Street journal op-ed—flew in the face of justices' efforts to portray the court as a nonpartisan institution.
Just before Kavanaugh was confirmed, Kagan and Justice Sonia Sotomayor spoke at Princeton University about the need to avoid partisanship on the court. “It's just the nine of us,” Kagan added. “We all have a vested interest in having good relations with one another.” And retired Justice John Paul Stevens said Kavanaugh's outburst disqualified him for being a Supreme Court justice.
But still, Kavanaugh could have an easier time than Thomas in getting past any animus justices might have about Kavanaugh's hyper-partisan confirmation statements.
Kavanaugh is well known by many of the justices and he clerked at the high court, unlike Thomas. Kavanaugh taught at Harvard Law School at the behest of Kagan, then the law's school's dean. And as an aide in the Bush White House, he helped John Roberts Jr. and Samuel Alito Jr. in their own confirmation proceedings.
Even so, Kavanaugh may still experience the awe and nervousness about joining the highest court in the land. When the late Justice William Brennan Jr. joined the court in 1956, he remarked that “it's quite a frightening experience to come here for the first time.” Brennan added that he felt like “the mule entered in the Kentucky Derby—I don't expect to distinguish myself, but I do expect to benefit from the association.”
Read more:
Brett Kavanaugh, Neutrality Questioned, Ascends to Supreme Court
Kavanaugh Walks Back His Angry Senate Testimony
Awaiting a Ninth Justice, Supreme Court Tinkers With Its Docket
Appellate Lawyers Who Backed Kavanaugh Say He's Still Their Man
Neil Gorsuch Loves His 'Dream Job,' Ignores the Criticism, Friends Say
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBrownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute readWeil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
3 minute readFTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute readSupreme Court Will Hear Religious Parents' Bid to Opt Out of LGBTQ-Themed School Books
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.