Donald Trump Is the Punisher of the Press, According to PEN American Lawsuit
PEN American Center has sued President Donald Trump in his capacity as president for his alleged threats and retaliatory actions against the news media.
October 16, 2018 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
Claiming President Donald Trump has misused his powers by threatening and attempting to retaliate against news media outlets with whom he disagrees, an organization representing writers and literary professionals filed a lawsuit in federal court Tuesday seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.
The First Amendment lawsuit filed by PEN American Center gives a flurry of examples of the president's alleged retaliation for perceived negative coverage. It was filed in the U.S. District Court from the Southern District of New York, and sued Trump in his capacity as president.
“Journalists who report on the president or his administration reasonably believe they face a credible threat of government retaliation for carrying out the duties of their profession,” the lawsuit states.
Here's the Full Complaint:
Among the examples cited: the Department of Justice's antitrust enforcement action against the merger of CNN's parent company, Time Warner, with AT&T. Trump has constantly attacked CNN at his rallies and in his tweets. Another talking point: Trump's executive order for the U.S. Postal Service to examine raising rates on Amazon, which is founded and run by Jeff Bezos, also the owner of The Washington Post. That was a retaliatory action, the lawsuit claims, which led to last week's announcement by the U.S. Postal Service that it was proposing a 12 percent increase for the Parcel Select service used by Amazon. Trump has also often blasted The Post for what he perceives as negative coverage.
PEN American Center referred all comment to The Protect Democracy Project, one of two entities that helped write the lawsuit and assist PEN in its legal avenues. And the Yale Media Freedom Information & Access Clinic, which also assisted, referred all calls to PEN American.
Both the Yale clinic and Protect Democracy Project are offering their services pro bono, according to Aditi Juneja, an attorney and communications organizer with Protect Democracy Project. It was unclear Tuesday what they would bill, if their client won attorney fees, as sought in the complaint. Both groups are nonprofits and do not charge clients. If they won, there is a fee formula within the federal Equal Access to Justice Act that would determine their fees.
No one from the White House Press Office responded to a request for comment by press time.
“It was important for an organization to stand up and make it clear that it is not OK under the First Amendment and it is not OK under the U.S. Constitution,” Juneja told the Connecticut Law Tribune Tuesday. “This lawsuit is not just about writers and journalists, but about everyone's right to free speech, which is a fundamental right in a democracy.”
No media outlets are named as plaintiffs, and Juneja said it's not clear if any will join in at a later date. PEN American Center has standing to bring the suit because its members include literary professionals and writers who work in the media.
“There is associational standing,” Juneja said. “Some PEN members are members of the media and can sue in their own right.”
The suit does not seek punitive damages, and the only monetary damages sought are attorney fees. It seeks an injunctive order, asking the court to bar the president from carrying out any retaliation actions against the media, or directing any government agency or employee to do the same. The plaintiff also seeks declaratory relief: a declaration from the judge that Trump “has and continues to violate the First Amendment,” Juneja said.
The lawsuit comes as the press is under siege in many parts of the world, with the latest example being the killing of a Saudi journalist in Turkey. Many believe that journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, who was a critic of the regime in Saudi Arabia, was targeted for murder by that country's leaders.
“President Trump's anti-press actions are taking place at a time when autocrats around the world, including in Hungary, Poland, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, have been ramping up their attacks on a free press,” Kristy Parker, counsel to Protect Democracy Project, said in a press release.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250