Donald Trump Is the Punisher of the Press, According to PEN American Lawsuit
PEN American Center has sued President Donald Trump in his capacity as president for his alleged threats and retaliatory actions against the news media.
October 16, 2018 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
Claiming President Donald Trump has misused his powers by threatening and attempting to retaliate against news media outlets with whom he disagrees, an organization representing writers and literary professionals filed a lawsuit in federal court Tuesday seeking declaratory and injunctive relief.
The First Amendment lawsuit filed by PEN American Center gives a flurry of examples of the president's alleged retaliation for perceived negative coverage. It was filed in the U.S. District Court from the Southern District of New York, and sued Trump in his capacity as president.
“Journalists who report on the president or his administration reasonably believe they face a credible threat of government retaliation for carrying out the duties of their profession,” the lawsuit states.
Here's the Full Complaint:
Among the examples cited: the Department of Justice's antitrust enforcement action against the merger of CNN's parent company, Time Warner, with AT&T. Trump has constantly attacked CNN at his rallies and in his tweets. Another talking point: Trump's executive order for the U.S. Postal Service to examine raising rates on Amazon, which is founded and run by Jeff Bezos, also the owner of The Washington Post. That was a retaliatory action, the lawsuit claims, which led to last week's announcement by the U.S. Postal Service that it was proposing a 12 percent increase for the Parcel Select service used by Amazon. Trump has also often blasted The Post for what he perceives as negative coverage.
PEN American Center referred all comment to The Protect Democracy Project, one of two entities that helped write the lawsuit and assist PEN in its legal avenues. And the Yale Media Freedom Information & Access Clinic, which also assisted, referred all calls to PEN American.
Both the Yale clinic and Protect Democracy Project are offering their services pro bono, according to Aditi Juneja, an attorney and communications organizer with Protect Democracy Project. It was unclear Tuesday what they would bill, if their client won attorney fees, as sought in the complaint. Both groups are nonprofits and do not charge clients. If they won, there is a fee formula within the federal Equal Access to Justice Act that would determine their fees.
No one from the White House Press Office responded to a request for comment by press time.
“It was important for an organization to stand up and make it clear that it is not OK under the First Amendment and it is not OK under the U.S. Constitution,” Juneja told the Connecticut Law Tribune Tuesday. “This lawsuit is not just about writers and journalists, but about everyone's right to free speech, which is a fundamental right in a democracy.”
No media outlets are named as plaintiffs, and Juneja said it's not clear if any will join in at a later date. PEN American Center has standing to bring the suit because its members include literary professionals and writers who work in the media.
“There is associational standing,” Juneja said. “Some PEN members are members of the media and can sue in their own right.”
The suit does not seek punitive damages, and the only monetary damages sought are attorney fees. It seeks an injunctive order, asking the court to bar the president from carrying out any retaliation actions against the media, or directing any government agency or employee to do the same. The plaintiff also seeks declaratory relief: a declaration from the judge that Trump “has and continues to violate the First Amendment,” Juneja said.
The lawsuit comes as the press is under siege in many parts of the world, with the latest example being the killing of a Saudi journalist in Turkey. Many believe that journalist, Jamal Khashoggi, who was a critic of the regime in Saudi Arabia, was targeted for murder by that country's leaders.
“President Trump's anti-press actions are taking place at a time when autocrats around the world, including in Hungary, Poland, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, have been ramping up their attacks on a free press,” Kristy Parker, counsel to Protect Democracy Project, said in a press release.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readDC Judge Chutkan Allows Jenner's $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit to Proceed Against Sierra Leone
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250