Brett Kavanaugh Recuses From Three Upcoming SCOTUS Arguments
All three cases arise from Kavanaugh's previous service on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
October 19, 2018 at 05:22 PM
3 minute read
Newly confirmed Justice Brett Kavanaugh will sit out arguments later this fall in three cases involving securities, international immunities and Medicare—and potentially more as the term progresses.
All three cases arise from Kavanaugh's previous service on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He sat as a member of a three-judge panel on two and participated in an en banc order in the third.
The three cases, which could result in 4-4 decisions because of his recusals, are:
>> Azar v. Allina Health Services. The justices will decide if the Medicare Act and the Administrative Procedure Act required the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to give notice and opportunity for comment before implementing a rule that changed its Medicare reimbursement formula. Kavanaugh sat on the panel and wrote the opinion in favor of Allina. The petition, filed by U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco, was granted late last month, and arguments have not yet been scheduled. Stephanie Webster of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld is counsel to Allina.
>> Jam v. International Finance Corp. Indian fishermen, farmers and others are seeking tort damages from the corporation. The court is asked whether the International Organizations Immunities Act gives international organizations the same immunity that foreign governments had at the time the act was passed, or what foreign governments currently enjoy. Kavanaugh was on the September 2017 order denying en banc review in the case. Stanford Law School's Jeffrey Fisher represents Jam and others; Donald Verrilli of Munger, Tolles & Olson, is counsel to the corporation. The case is scheduled for argument on Oct. 31.
>> Lorenzo v. Securities and Exchange Commission. Kavanaugh dissented from the D.C. Circuit panel decision in this case. The justices will decide whether a false statement by someone who did not have ultimate authority over the statement can still be subject to a fraudulent scheme claim under Rule 10b-5. Robert Heim of New York's Meyers & Heim is counsel to Lorenzo. Francisco represents the SEC. Arguments will be held on Dec. 3.
Kavanaugh joined the bench on Oct. 9 after a bruising confirmation proceeding, and he's heard four cases so far. Other cases in the wings from the D.C. Circuit could present future recusal issues.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHealth Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readHospital Succeeds in Denying Vaccine Religious Accommodation Through 'Undue Hardship' Defense
'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute read'Bipartisan Focus': Health Care Antitrust Litigation Likely to Remain Hot in 2025
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250