Plaintiffs Lawyers With Big Law Ties Seek $300K in Legal Fees From EPA
The Washington appellate boutique Donahue, Goldberg & Weaver, home to former U.S. Supreme Court clerks, wants the D.C. Circuit to force the EPA to pay up.
October 22, 2018 at 06:44 PM
4 minute read
A team of plaintiffs lawyers who successfully challenged the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's effort to delay implementation of an oil and gas rule are asking a federal appeals court to award more than $300,000 in legal fees.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit last year rebuked the Trump administration's EPA for pausing enforcement of Obama-era regulations concerning methane and other greenhouse gas emissions. The rule imposed certain air-pollutant monitoring and reporting requirements on oil and gas companies.
“The regulation EPA unlawfully tried to suspend has now been in effect for more than two years, and all compliance deadlines passed over a year ago, helping to reduce pollution emissions that, according to EPA, 'endanger both the public health and the public welfare of current and future generations,'” the petitioners wrote in a court filing Monday at the D.C. Circuit. Second annual reports on leak-detection monitoring are due at the end of October.
Susannah Weaver, a partner at the Washington appellate boutique Donahue, Goldberg & Weaver, is seeking fees at $689 hourly, according to court papers submitted Monday in the D.C. Circuit. Weaver was lead counsel for petitioners including Clean Air Council, Earthworks and the Environmental Defense Fund.
Weaver formerly clerked for Justice Stephen Breyer in 2012 and, before joining Donahue Goldberg, was a senior associate on the appellate team at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. Weaver billed $705 hourly at Orrick in 2016, according to Monday's court filing.
“This was also a hard-fought case, involving matters of national interest. A dozen states and state agencies intervened to defend EPA, along with more than 20 industry parties, represented by prominent private counsel,” Weaver wrote in the court papers. The challengers said they were submitting billing records for only four lawyers who worked on the case, eliminating “more than 280 hours actually expended on this litigation.”
Sean Donahue, a name partner at Donahue Goldberg, submitted billing records for $764 an hour. Donahue, a founding member of the firm, formerly clerked for then-Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the D.C. Circuit and later for Justice John Paul Stevens in 1993. Donahue formerly was an associate in the Washington office of Jenner & Block.
Fellow name partner David Goldberg also clerked for then-Judge Ginsburg and for Justice David Souter. Their Supreme Court clerkships coincided with those of fellow clerks Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh. Goldberg is also of counsel to the Stanford Law School Supreme Court Clinic.
Former Jenner appellate partner Paul Smith, writing in a declaration to the D.C. Circuit, said Donahue's “deep understanding of the Clean Air Act” is “matched by few other attorneys in the United States.”
Weaver said the plaintiffs tried to negotiate with the EPA over legal fees, “but those efforts were unsuccessful.” A spokesperson for the EPA said the agency would not comment on pending litigation. The EPA will have a chance to content the plaintiffs' fee request.
|The plaintiffs' fee petition is posted below:
Read more:
Coal Lobbyist, Trump's Pick for Scott Pruitt's Deputy, Reveals Pay, Clients
|Tony Mauro contributed reporting from Washington.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250