Four More Trump Picks Sail Through Recess Confirmation Hearing
The hearing was convened by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, despite a congressional recess.
October 24, 2018 at 01:57 PM
4 minute read
Four Trump administration nominees coasted through their judicial confirmation hearing Wednesday, fielding only a handful of questions in a session that lasted less than an hour.
The hearing—for Ninth Circuit picks Eric Miller and Bridget Bade and court nominees Richard Hertling and Karin Immergut on separate panels—was convened by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, despite a congressional recess.
Two senators attended Wednesday's showing—Republican Sens. Mike Crapo of Idaho, who presided over the hearing, and Orrin Hatch of Utah. Only Crapo questioned the nominees, while Hatch praised the nominees.
Democrats have opposed Grassley's decision to hold hearings during recess. On Wednesday, the Alliance for Justice, a liberal judiciary-focused organization, called the session “a farce.”
“What we saw today was Republican senators shirking their constitutional responsibilities in order to pack more of Trump's judicial nominees onto the federal bench with no scrutiny,” the group said.
Miller, a Perkins Coie partner, used the Wednesday hearing to respond to criticism over his views of tribal sovereignty. Civil rights-focused groups are opposing Miller's nomination, in part because he previously opposed Native American tribes in litigation.
The attorney pointed to his role heading Perkins Coie's appellate practice, acknowledging that “the firm's clients have tended to be adverse to tribes in litigation.” Miller was also previously an assistant in the U.S. Solicitor General's office.
In any of the cases he's argued, he said, “my role has been that of an advocate. My job as an advocate is not to advance my own views but to advance the client's views and to do the most that I can within the bounds of the law to zealously achieve the client's interests.” He added that, as a judge, he would neutrally apply the law and principles reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, “that tribes are independent sovereigns, that treaties with tribes must be respected and must be understood as the tribes would have understood them.”
Miller, a former Justice Clarence Thomas clerk, has not received blue slips from either of his home state senators, Democrats Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell in Washington.
The other nominees on Wednesday were asked to discuss the legality of nationwide injunctions, as well as the role of judges and their approaches to the law.
Hertling, tapped for a seat on the Court of Federal Claims, emphasized the importance of impartiality and fact-finding for trial judges. He said they should also decide matters “promptly,” noting the large personal and financial stakes litigants have in cases.
Hertling, of counsel at Covington & Burling, said that “sitting in this room is a homecoming for me.” Hertling worked for over a decade, on and off, as a congressional lawyer on Capitol Hill.
Bade, a federal magistrate judge in Arizona, declined to weigh in on the legality of national injunctions, since it's a matter currently being litigated in the courts. She noted that civil procedure rules were “silent” on the scope of an injunction, and said the Supreme Court has not yet “spoken” on the issue.
Immergut, a Multnomah County Circuit Court judge tapped for the district court in Oregon, also declined to comment specifically on the issue.
“[I]'m going to follow the law, but I do recognize the pros and cons that have been debated on nationwide injunctions, both that they might provide finality of an issue and uniformity, but counter to that is that a judge is deciding issues for the rest of the country, even though only certain parties are before them in their individual district,” she said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Possible Harm'?: Winston & Strawn Will Appeal Unfavorable Ruling in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readWilmer, Miles & Stockbridge, and Polsinelli Hire Litigation, Government Contract Attorneys
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250