Elena Kagan Favors Life Tenure, But Doesn't Dismiss Term Limits
Life tenure, Justice Elena Kagan says, helps “make us independent” by making sure that justices don't color their decision-making to please a future employer. “We won't have a next job. We won't need anything from anybody.”
October 25, 2018 at 11:10 AM
4 minute read
Life tenure for U.S. Supreme Court justices is a good thing, Elena Kagan said Wednesday, but she also sees possible merit in switching to 18-year terms so that “no single nomination would be a life or death thing.”
While debate over term limits and other reforms for the Supreme Court has ramped up recently, justices have generally steered clear of the discussion.
Kagan spoke before an audience at Georgetown University Law Center to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the National Celebration of Pro Bono sponsored by the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Pro Bono and Public Service. ABA President Robert Carlson asked Kagan questions about pro bono service and other topics.
“I'm pretty happy with it,” Kagan said with a smile, referring to life tenure. It was built into the Constitution, she added, to “make us independent” by making sure that justices don't color their decision-making to please a future employer. “We won't have a next job. We won't need anything from anybody,” she said.
Kagan wondered aloud whether an 18-year term for justices would provide the same independence as life tenure. “Maybe,” she said, adding that an 18-year term might “take the high stakes out of the confirmation process.”
Asked about the perceived politicization of the Supreme Court, another hot topic surrounding the justices, Kagan said the court still enjoys a legitimacy and credibility that the court “has to be very careful to protect.” People who accuse the court of being political may not “understand what we do,” she said, pointing to the fact that most of the court's rulings are unanimous or decided by lopsided votes.
But because of differing judicial philosophies, Kagan said that in a small number of cases, the court does its “5-4 thing,” with the votes reflecting “the party of the president who nominated us.” When that happens, she said, “It's not partisan, but you can see how people would look at that and say, 'what's going on here.'” She added, “Every single one of us should think about that.”
Kagan extolled the importance of pro bono work for all lawyers, whether they go into private practice or public service. “There are all kinds of ways to help the pubic, serve the public,” she said, urging students not to over-program their careers from the start. In her own career, Kagan said her best jobs were the result of unexpected opportunities placed before her, and most were in public service.
“Don't plan so much,” Kagan said. “Be alert to serendipity.”
Kagan drew laughter when Carlson asked her whether she is recognized when she is out in the public. The justice said that when she first joined the court, after the highly public confirmation process, she was often spotted and asked for selfies. “I don't think the selfie is a good invention,” she said.
But that notoriety has faded, according to Kagan. Not long ago, while she was dining at a restaurant, someone approached Kagan and said, “It is such an honor to meet you, Justice Ginsburg.” Kagan told the Georgetown audience, “We're not all Justice Ginsburg! We can't all be Justice Ginsburg!”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided 5th Circuit Shoots Down Nasdaq Diversity Rules
Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
5 minute readLawyers, Law Groups Oppose Proposal to Require Court Approval for Amicus Briefs
9th Circuit Judges Weigh if Section 230 Shields Grindr From Defective Design Claims
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250