Appellate Hot List 2018: McGuireWoods
McGuireWoods partner Matt Fitzgerald discusses the firm's win in the U.S. Supreme Court case, Collins v. Virginia.
October 26, 2018 at 05:46 AM
2 minute read
Tell us about your top U.S. Supreme Court or federal appeals court victory over the past year and how you and your team achieved the win.
The greatest recent success by McGuireWoods' appeals team is [the U.S. Supreme Court case] Collins v. Virginia. On the merits, we persuaded the court to rule in our favor, 8-1. Collins now guards the Fourth Amendment rights of every American who lives in a house and parks a car nearby.
The firm handled the appeal with only one partner and two associates, all age 35 or younger at the outset. That team drafted a certiorari petition that Empirical SCOTUS later labeled the best-written petition of the 2017-2018 court term.
Over the past few years, McGuireWoods has built a powerful appeals team outside the Beltway. The young team includes six former U.S. Supreme Court clerks, with a seventh joining this fall, and handles appeals across the country.
How did your firm approach appellate success over the past year?
Appeals boil down years of litigation to a few written pages and a few spoken minutes. Such a condensed practice perfectly fits bright young lawyers and McGuireWoods intentionally brings those attorneys to our toughest appeals. The briefs and arguments the team produces dazzle our clients.
What practice advice would you give your younger self?
I am 36, so in the world of appeals team leaders, I am my younger self. Some advice I always carry is that every appeal tells a story and so the lawyer who puts the white hat on his client will have the upper hand.
Responses submitted by Matt Fitzgerald, partner and co-chair of McGuireWoods' appeals and Issues group.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Patent Innovators Can Look to International Trade Commission Enforcement for Protection, IP Lawyers Say
Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
5 minute readOutgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
19 minute readEx-Deputy AG Trusts U.S. Legal System To Pull Country Through Times of Duress
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250