Foley & Lardner Suffers 'Cyber Event,' Says Data Safe, As Law Firms Remain Targets
Law firms are as big a target for hackers as ever. Plus, look out for "cryptojackers."
October 29, 2018 at 03:38 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Foley & Lardner this month experienced what it called a “cyber event” that disrupted its information technology systems despite no client data being accessed, a spokeswoman for the Am Law 100 firm said in an email.
The incident, first reported last week by Bloomberg, is a reminder to law firms that they remain high-priority targets of hackers, ransomware and, more recently, nefarious miners of cryptocurrency.
“We have security safeguards in place designed to protect our systems and data and have confirmed no unauthorized access to client data,” said Foley & Lardner spokeswoman Jill Chanen in a statement. “Safeguarding the security and confidentiality of our client information is and will continue to be our highest priority. Throughout this situation, our professionals continued to provide the level of service excellence our clients expect.”
Foley & Lardner, which earlier this year absorbed Texas-based Gardere Wynne Sewell, did not comment on the nature of the event or provide more details about how it was resolved.
Austin Berglas, global head of professional services at cybersecurity firm BlueVoyant, said the statement from Foley & Lardner seemed to describe what would happen in the event of a ransomware attack or a so-called cryptojacking attack. Neither are necessarily designed to steal client data.
Cryptojacking is a relatively new phenomenon. Cryptojackers use a kind of malware that uses a company's computing network power to run the heavy-duty computing programs that produce or “mine” new virtual currencies such as bitcoin. A survey by network security firm McAfee LLC found that cryptojacking attacks were up 629 percent in the first quarter of this year. McAfee said it recorded nearly 3 million instances of “coin mining” malware during the first quarter of 2018, compared with less than 500,000 just a quarter earlier.
“We've seen cases where we find ransomware in Fort Knox, essentially. There is gold bullion there and the bad guys didn't realize it because that's not what they're looking for,” Berglas said. “It depends what the adversary is looking for. If they are only interested in getting their crypto-mining executables on as many servers as possible, then a company has essentially dodged a bullet. They're dealing with a bad guy who does not want that information, they're just looking for processing power.”
Berglas, a former FBI special agent in charge of cyber who has worked with law firms, said that the vulnerabilities hackers exploit to install ransomware or crypto-mining software can also be used to steal client data. And sometimes, hackers sell access to the vulnerabilities they have found in corporate networks.
“The key here is no matter what if you are seeing unauthorized access, no matter what they did when they got in, you have a problem you need to fix,” Berglas said. “Because that vulnerability can be used by multiple actors in a lot of ways.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250