Tribes Sue North Dakota for Suppressing Right to Vote in Midterms
Submitted by attorneys from the Native American Rights Fund, Robins Kaplan and Campaign Legal Center, the complaint accuses North Dakota's secretary of state of providing “deeply flawed” systems for assigning and verifying residential addresses that “produce conflicting and inaccurate results.”
October 31, 2018 at 04:31 PM
4 minute read
Members of three Native American tribes looking to vote in the 2018 midterms have filed suit against North Dakota's secretary of state for allegedly suppressing their right to vote.
The complaint, filed on behalf of members of the Sioux Spirit Lake, Chippewa, and Cheyenne tribes, alleges that North Dakota's “unplanned, untested, and broken” law requiring voters to present identification at the polls to prove their current residential address poses “a severe impediment” to their constitutional right to vote. Many Native Americans “simply have no residential address because the government has not assigned them one,” according to the lawsuit.
“Because the systems for assigning and verifying residential addresses are deeply flawed and produce conflicting and inaccurate results, and have generated significant confusion, qualified Native American voters face a substantial risk of being denied the right to vote,” the complaint said, noting that affected voters “have already been denied access to the ballot.”
The experiences detailed by the six plaintiffs vary, though mostly revolve around discrepancies with North Dakota's “My Voting Information,” an online tool used by the state to validate residential addresses and plaintiffs' “911” addresses, a state-issued location for mail and emergency services.
One member of the Spirit Lake Tribe claims his absentee ballot was rejected after his address listed on a state-issued ID didn't appear on the online tool. During a 2012 election, two other plaintiffs—Chippewa members living on a reservation—were assigned an address in a different county that doesn't exist in the online tool, and thus have to leave their current county to vote.
Plaintiffs claim these instances violate their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and seek injunctive relief to vote in the U.S. midterm elections on Nov. 6. Matthew Campbell, one of the Native American Rights Fund attorneys representing them, said the state “has pushed through a voter identification system that is confusing and in disarray. And people living on reservations are being most affected.”
“Reservation addresses in the state's database are inconsistent, inaccurate, and uncertain. Homes are listed on streets identified as 'unknown' and in towns that are off the reservations. Figuring out the state's peculiar listings for residential addresses on reservations should not be a prerequisite to voting,” Campbell said.
The lawsuit comes amid a contentious midterm election cycle in which Democrats are looking to flip the House and Senate. Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, D-North Dakota, is currently trailing in polls as she seeks re-election against Rep. Kevin Cramer.
Current state law prevents residents from voting without an ID showing their name, residential address and birth date. Robins Kaplan partner Timothy Purdon, another one of the plaintiffs' lawyers, noted that recent investigations suggest this “threatens to disenfranchise not only those who do not have street access to the necessary ID, but those whose IDs contain addresses the state deems 'invalid.'”
“This is extremely problematic as the lawsuit alleges that North Dakota's system for assigning address appears to be incomplete, contradictory, and prone to error on reservations,” he added.
Indeed, one of the plaintiffs in the suit, a Cheyenne, claims she was unable to receive a Tribal ID supplied by a tribe, as she lives on a Sioux reservation without being a member. The plaintiff wants to vote on election day, the complaint says, but “has not identified any way to obtain an identification or supplemental documentation of her residential address that would allow her to vote on Election Day.”
North Dakota Secretary of State Alvin Jaeger's office said they do not comment on pending litigation.
Mark Gaber, senior legal counsel at the Campaign Legal Center who is also representing the plaintiffs, said that “If North Dakota cannot perform the basic governmental function of having a coherent and consistent system of designating street addresses on reservations, then it cannot make having a 'valid' address a precondition to voting.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Financial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Trending Stories
- 1Considering the Implications of the 2024 Presidential Election for Jurors in White Collar Cases
- 22024 in Review: Judges Met Out Punishments for Ex-Apple, FDIC, Moody's Legal Leaders
- 3What We Heard From Litigation Leaders in 2024
- 4Akin and Simpson Create New Practice Groups With Integrated Teams
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250