5 Takeaways From the SEC Enforcement Division's Annual Report
The report highlights the commission's activities during Fiscal Year 2018, including cases involving Tesla and now-defunct Theranos.
November 02, 2018 at 01:20 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission recovered $794 million for harmed investors and obtained judgments and orders totaling nearly $4 billion in disgorgement and penalties during Fiscal Year 2018, according to the latest annual report from the agency's enforcement division.
The report stresses the division's intent to protect individual investors, push for accountability and keep pace with technology. And it shows that the SEC's enforcement arm “has been and continues to be extremely successful in its efforts to deter bad conduct and effectively remedy harms to investors,” SEC chairman Jay Clayton said in a prepared statement.
The bulk of the SEC's enforcement actions this year dealt with securities offerings, which accounted for about 25 percent of the agency's cases. Investment advisory issues ranked a close second and made up about 22 percent of the SEC's enforcement activity. Accounting and auditing issues were the third most common cases followed by broker-dealer misconduct, insider trading and market manipulation.
Here are five key takeaways from the report:
- New approach to compliance: The SEC said it leveraged its undertakings (compliance) enforcement tool, which requires defendants to take steps to comply with the specific terms of a court order, in novel ways in two high-profile cases involving Tesla and Theranos Inc. The agency forced Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes to relinquish voting control over the blood-testing company. She also had to guarantee that she wouldn't profit from a sale of the now-defunct company until $750 million was returned to those who were duped into
investing in Theranos. In the Tesla case, the SEC required CEO Elon Musk to resign as chairman and take several other compliance actions, including hiring independent directors to oversee the CEO's public statements about the company, after Musk tweeted that he was thinking about taking Tesla private.
- Eyes on cryptocurrency: The Enforcement Division has been teaming up with the SEC's new Cyber Unit to go after ne'er-do-wells who are meddling in digital assets and initial coin offerings. The agencies have used the SEC's trading suspension authority along with public statements to deter misconduct and educate investors. This year, the SEC brought more than a dozen enforcement actions related to ICOs and cryptocurrency and opened many more investigations that remain active.
- Serious push to protect retail investors: More than half of the agency's stand-alone actions this year involved wrongdoing against individual investors in cases that centered on fees and expenses and conflicts of interest for managed accounts; market manipulations; and fraud in unregistered offerings. Several actions centered on Ponzi schemes that tricked investors out of millions of dollars, according to the SEC.
- Cybercrime is a growing concern: The SEC formed a Cyber Unit late last year as part of an effort to crack down on cyberattacks. This year, the agency had more than 225 active investigations. In one case, the SEC alleged that false regulatory filings were used to manipulate the price of Fitbit stock. Another enforcement action targeted a day trader in Philadelphia accused of raking in at least $700,000 through a scheme that involved accessing the brokerage accounts of more than 100 victims to make unauthorized trades to inflate the stock prices of various companies.
- Doing more with less: The SEC has been dealing with a hiring freeze that began in 2016. Since then the number of employees and contractors at the agency has dropped by about 10 percent. But the agency's enforcement activity increased this year, when it filed 821 actions, compared with 754 last year.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRepublican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
4 minute readCars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
'Water Cooler Discussions': US Judge Questions DOJ Request in Google Search Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250