Law Firms Step Up Election Volunteering as Voter Suppression Fears Rise
Dozens of big law firms are hosting call centers and making other efforts to protect voting rights in Tuesday's highly charged midterm elections.
November 05, 2018 at 03:23 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Amid worries that voting suppression efforts have intensified in the run-up to Tuesday's midterm elections, the national Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law is counting on nearly 100 large law firms to ensure that citizens succeed at making their voices heard at the ballot box.
Big Law attorneys will be spreading out across the country to serve as poll monitors and will be manning hotline call centers to respond to concerns about ballot access. And, in the event of any “eleventh hour mischief,” some are prepared to initiate litigation in partnership with the organization's staff attorneys, said president and executive director Kristen Clarke.
“In all of the areas of the work that we do, it is perhaps here where we see corporate law firms really standing up and offering their resources to help fight back,” Clarke added. “It speaks to how central the right to vote is in our democracy.”
The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law dates back to 1963, when President John F. Kennedy, Vice President Lyndon Johnson and Attorney General Robert Kennedy summoned nearly 250 private attorneys to the White House to support the civil rights fight. While the group's election protection program has been in place for 18 years, the significance of the effort has increased in recent years.
That owes to the U.S. Supreme Court's 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, which gutted provisions of the 1965 Voting Right Act that required certain states and localities to obtain federal pre-clearance before changing their voting laws and practices. Since then, Clarke says, discriminatory pressures on voting have moved forward at an “unrelenting pace.”
Those developments have prompted lawsuits around the country, pertaining both to states previously covered by the law's pre-clearance mandate and to new states. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, litigation regarding voting restrictions is currently unfolding in 17 states.
According to Clarke, in the current climate, more firms are committing pro bono resources to the issue. One notable example is in stepping up to host call centers. The organization largely hosts the national 866-OUR-VOTE hotline out of its own office, but Monday it moved to 18 sites around the country.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett expects over 230 volunteers at its call center in New York, according to partner John Ericson. Other call center hosts include Drinker Biddle & Reath in Washington, D.C., Reed Smith in Los Angeles and Kirkland & Ellis in Chicago, San Francisco and New York.
Dorsey & Whitney, which has been involved in the election protection project for over a decade, hosts a call center in Minneapolis that serves voters from Minnesota as well as Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Missouri, North Dakota and South Dakota, according to a spokeswoman for the firm. “This group's skill and dedication to protecting the franchise is inspiring,” partner Jonathan Van Horn said in a statement. “A few years ago, I assisted a first-time voter over several hours and several phone calls. His grandmother later sent me note that says it all: 'Hallelujah, he was finally allowed to cast his vote.'”
Other firms are getting their attorneys out of the office. Venable is sending a dozen lawyers from around the country to Ohio to serve as nonpartisan poll monitors in conjunction with the committee.
“This is the least we can do to insure that all eligible voters are allowed to vote if they make the effort to go to their polling stations,” partner William Coston said in a statement. “Lawyers have a special duty and privilege to help voters exercise their rights to pick their leaders.”
Steptoe & Johnson LLP, meanwhile, announced it will be providing all employees with two hours of paid leave to vote on Tuesday, in conjunction with non-partisan efforts at ElectionDay.org and MakeTimetoVote.org. As of Monday, it was the sole law firm listed by either initiative as taking part.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
- 1Friday Newspaper
- 2Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 3Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 4NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 5A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250