Top Financial Regulator Says Fintech Plans Unfazed Over New Lawsuit
"Most people who have gone to their law firms and have asked their opinion would say it clearly is within the authority of the OCC to do this,” Joseph Otting said Wednesday in Washington.
November 07, 2018 at 01:04 PM
4 minute read
A top regulator predicted Wednesday that financial technology firms would begin to apply as early as the next month or two for specialty national banking licenses, saying the industry has largely been undeterred by a pending legal challenge to the federal government's plan to provide a pathway for online lenders and payment companies to more directly compete with traditional banks.
Joseph Otting, the head of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, said he was “disappointed” that the New York Department of Financial Services and other state regulators renewed their legal challenge to the agency's plan to accept national bank charter applications from so-called fintech companies. Speaking at the Georgetown University Law Center, Otting voiced confidence the OCC would prevail in court and said the lawsuit was “harming consumers.”
Meanwhile, the OCC plans to accept and review applications from financial technology companies, Otting said.
“A number of entities have decided that it's still worth going forward. And so I think that we will issue charters independent of their action. I also think that we will get our day in court on this issue,” Otting said.
The OCC expects to receive the first charter application from a fintech company “either later this year or the first part of next year,” Otting said.
After the conference, when asked whether the legal challenge was suppressing interest in applying for bank charters, Otting suggested the fintech industry has been unfazed. “I think people are aware of it. Most people who have gone to their law firms and have asked their opinion would say it clearly is within the authority of the OCC to do this,” he said.
For online lenders and other fintech companies, a national banking charter is an attractive prospect. Such a charter would free those firms from having to go through the patchwork of state-by-state approvals they presently need to offer loans and provide other financial products.
In September, the New York's state financial regulator, Maria Vullo, challenged the OCC's authority to offer national bank charters, calling the move to begin accepting applications “lawless, ill-conceived, and destabilizing of financial markets.” The lawsuit also argued that the OCC's move “puts New York financial consumers—and often the most vulnerable ones—at great risk of exploitation by federally-chartered entities.”
Otting pushed back against those claims Wednesday, saying it was New York's Department of Financial Services and other state regulators who were harming consumers by limiting their choice of financial products.
“First of all, let me tell you, I was very disappointed. I have always believed in the dual banking system, where a financial institution can choose whether to be state regulated or federally regulated,” Otting said. He continued: “And our whole banking system in the U.S. is predicated on giving management, boards and investors the choice of the type of charter they would like to have. And so I think the actions by the states are really restricting consumer choice, because there are certain entities that will not enter certain states because they want to operate under one set of rules, one set of processes.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 2As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 3General Warrants and ESI
- 4GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
- 5Authenticating Electronic Signatures
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250