Tech Company Pays $775,000 for Attempt to Squash Union With Mass Firing
Lanetix Inc., a cloud services software company, was accused of pushing its coding engineers to stop discussing complaints about workplace conditions.
November 12, 2018 at 05:10 PM
3 minute read
|
A San Francisco-based software company reached a $775,000 agreement to settle a National Labor Relations Board charge that claimed the firm fired a group of engineers attempting to organize, the union announced Monday.
Lanetix Inc., a cloud services software company, was accused of pushing its coding engineers to stop discussing complaints about workplace conditions in person, on the chat app Slack, or via other electronic communication. According to the NLRB complaint, the company ultimately fired the group who filed a petition to form a union with a local branch of the Communication Workers of America, The Washington-Baltimore News Guild Local 32035.
Zwerdling, Paul, Kahn & Wolly represented the union. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart represented the company. Ogletree attorney John Ferrer did not respond to a request for comment.
The union announced the settlement Monday in a press release. It said the company agreed to pay the $775,000 to the 15 programmers, in addition to removing the terminations from its records, outlining the terms of the agreement and posting a statement at every location detailing workers' right to organize.
“This is a landmark win for tech workers,” former Lanetix developer Sahil Talwar said in a statement. “We have shown what can be accomplished by standing together and standing strong.”
The NLRB issued a complaint in August against Lanetix, alleging numerous violations of federal labor law, including the decision to fire its programmers in retaliation for the workers' decision to form a union.
The union said the issues between the engineers and the company began when a female software engineer spoke out and was fired after seeking more paid time off. Her colleagues then said the dismissal was unfair and brought the concerns to management, and they say they were encouraged to stop discussing “workplace conditions as a group,” Talwar said.
“In response, we wrote a letter asking management to do two things: Do right by the fired engineer, and recognize our right to organize,” he said. He added, “Rather than back down, we decided to fight for our co-worker and we made the decision to unionize.”
He said 10 days later, Lanetix fired the other 14 employees. According to the union, the settlement payment “restores the pay the workers lost and compensates them for their unjust treatment, illegal firing, and financial hardship.”
➤➤ Get more labor and employment news and insights with Labor of Law from Law.com. Learn more.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute read5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readDOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250