Trump's 3rd Circuit Nominee Grilled Over Ties to Chris Christie, Bridgegate
Paul Matey, up for a New Jersey seat on the Third Circuit, got a hearing Tuesday from the Senate Judiciary Committee even though both New Jersey senators have withheld their "blue slips" for his nomination.
November 13, 2018 at 05:14 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
Third Circuit nominee Paul Matey faced heavy questioning about his links to scandal-plagued former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie during Tuesday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on his nomination.
Responding to Democratic senators' questions about advice he gave Christie in connection with the Bridgegate scandal and other controversies in the governor's two terms, Matey generally said he had no direct knowledge of the events he was questioned about.
When Christie was U.S. attorney for the District of New Jersey, Matey worked alongside him as an assistant U.S. attorney from 2005 to 2009. Matey was then deputy chief counsel to Christie in the governor's office from 2010 to 2015. After that, he joined University Hospital in Newark, where he stayed until this September, when he joined Lowenstein Sandler in Roseland, New Jersey.
The White House announced Matey's nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in April to fill the seat vacated by Julio Fuentes, who took senior status.
The committee also held hearings Tuesday on four district court nominations—Jean-Paul Boulee, for the Northern District of Georgia; J. Nicholas Ranjan, for the Western District of Pennsylvania; James David Cain Jr., for the Western District of Louisiana; and Damon Ray Leichty, for the Northern District of Indiana.
At Tuesday's hearing, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, brought up the gridlock that plagued the city of Fort Lee, New Jersey, in 2013 as a result of lane closures on the George Washington Bridge after the city's mayor refused to endorse Christie's gubernatorial re-election campaign. Leahy said Matey “reportedly authorized efforts by the Christie administration officials to solicit political endorsements from mayors, including the Fort Lee mayor, as long as it was technically done after hours.”
Leahy said two Christie administration officials were convicted of criminal charges in connection with the Fort Lee episode, and asked Matey, “do you believe you provided sufficient legal advice?”
Matey responded that he had “no knowledge, or involvement or participation in any of those events,” and that “we certainly took steps to ensure at all times that the highest standards of ethics were followed in the office. Regrettably, that did not appear to happen in this case.”
Sen. Mazie Hirono, D-Hawaii, asked Matey about a 2011 deal by the Christie administration allowing Donald Trump to settle a $30 million tax bill for his Atlantic City casino properties for $5 million.
Matey responded that he had “no knowledge about this matter other than perhaps having read about it in public news accounts. I recollect reading about it but I was never involved in it.”
Hirono also asked Matey about whether he was involved in Christie's decision to grant a deferred prosecution deal to pharmaceutical manufacturer Bristol-Myers Squibb in exchange for the company funding a professorship at Seton Hall University School of Law, which is the alma mater of Matey and Christie.
The settlement “made the Bush administration so uneasy that the Justice Department issued new rules in 2008, limiting prosecutors' discretion to make such deals,” Hirono said.
“I believe that was entered into prior to my joining the office,” Matey said.
“If you had known, would you have advised the U.S. attorney, Mr. Christie, not to engage in this kind of settlement because the obvious quid pro quo is clear?” Hirono asked.
“My work as a United States attorney was always to follow the law faithfully, as given by this Congress. That is how I conducted myself and how I would have conducted myself in any matter,” he said.
Sen. Corey Booker, the former mayor of Newark, said he knew Matey from University Hospital, a major health care facility in that city “that had a lot of problems and scandals.” Booker said an outside rating agency that ranked patient care at hospitals had dropped University Hospital rating from a C to an F in recent years. Booker asked what Matey has done to remedy that situation.
Matey said the quality of patient care was “largely outside of my area as general counsel. But it was something we were always focused on as a hospital.”
The hearing was held even though both New Jersey senators, Robert Menendez and Booker, withheld their “blue slips” for Matey.
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said Menendez and Booker declined to submit their blue slips because Matey is a conservative, adding that's not a reason to hold back the nomination.
Grassley said the White House “made several extremely generous offers” in an attempt to reach an agreement with Booker and Menendez regarding all six of New Jersey's district and appeals court vacancies.
“In the yearlong consultation period, the New Jersey senators did not agree to even meet with Mr. Matey, nor did they recommend anyone else for the vacancy, and the only reason the New Jersey senators gave for their reluctance to agree to Mr. Matey's nomination is he was too conservative. In my opinion, the White House attempted to meaningfully consult but their efforts were not reciprocated,” Grassley said.
But Booker said Grassley misstated his reason for withholding his blue slip, and that the White House never offered him an opportunity to meet with Matey. He said Grassley “characterized the negotiations with the White House by perhaps only listening to the White House, because I was never approached by you to ask, 'was there a meaningful negotiation?'”
Booker objected to the scheduling of a hearing for Matey before the American Bar Association issued a rating on his qualifications. “Holding a hearing, having not even heard from the ABA—this is one more institutional guardrail that's being knocked down in an unprecedented way by this committee,” Booker said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAt Supreme Court These Days, the Liberal Justices Are 'Textualists' Too
'Clear Abuse of Discretion': 9th Circuit Says Judge Should Have Recused From Death Row Inmate's Lawsuit
When in Doubt: What's a Dubitante Opinion, and Why Do Judges Write Them?
Which 1-Judge Division Districts Have Adopted Anti-Forum Shopping Guidance?
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250