Charges Against Assange Put International Legal Team in Spotlight
A filing in a case out of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia says charges have been filed against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who is living in the Embassy of Ecuador in London.
November 16, 2018 at 04:06 PM
4 minute read
After the U.S. Department of Justice inadvertently disclosed that charges may be pending against Julian Assange, the controversial figure's international team of attorneys has been thrust back into the limelight.
Several news organizations late Thursday seized on a filing from August in a case pending out of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, which said that charges had been filed against the WikiLeaks founder, who is currently living in the Embassy of Ecuador in London.
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, which made the filing, quickly told several news organizations Friday, that “The court filing was made in error. That was not the intended name for this filing.” However, the news could have repercussions for the international list of attorneys representing Assange in the various legal challenges he faces across the globe, including asylum claims in England and a civil rights suit against Ecuador.
The attorney representing Assange regarding criminal investigations in the U.S. is Washington, D.C., attorney Barry Pollack. Earlier this year, Pollack left Miller & Chevalier to become a partner at the boutique Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck, Untereiner & Sauber.
Pollack, however, represents Assange through his solo firm, The Law Offices of Barry J. Pollack. He also represents Assange but does not represent WikiLeaks.
In a statement to the press, Pollack said the potential charges and the “haphazard” way the information had been revealed was “troubling.”
“The government bringing criminal charges against someone for publishing truthful information is a dangerous path for a democracy to take,” Pollack said in the statement.
As part of Assange's legal team overseas, Jennifer Robinson from the London-based firm Doughty Street Chambers has been advising both WikiLeaks and Assange regarding his asylum and extradition claims, according to Pollack and Robinson's online bio. Robinson did not immediately return a message seeking comment.
Robinson, whose practice focuses on free speech and civil liberties issues, previously worked at the London-based Finers Stephens Innocent LP, where she represented clients including The New York Times and Bloomberg.
Along with possibly facing an indictment in the U.S., Assange has sued the government of Ecuador. Since 2012, Assange has been in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, seeking asylum after being charged by Swedish authorities with sexual assault. He still could face charges related to skipping bail in connection with the charges.
Assange recently sued Ecuador, alleging they violated his rights by cutting off his phone and internet access.
According to press reports, Assange is being represented in those efforts by Spanish attorney and ex-judge Baltasar Garzón and Ecuadorian attorney Carlos Poveda.
Assange has been a controversial figure since his organization, WikiLeaks, began publishing diplomatic cables from the U.S. State Department, beginning in 2010. In 2016, the group also released troves of Democratic Party emails stolen by Russian hackers.
The filing that caught the media's attention Thursday was made in a case against a man charged with “coercion and enticement of a minor” as part of the DOJ's effort to have the case sealed. The Aug. 22 filing in United States v. Kokayi said that, aside from sealing the docket, “no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged.”
It was not immediately clear whether the charges were part of special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe.
In an interview Friday with Law.com, Pollack did not say whether he had been in contact with Assange or any other members of Assange's international legal team, but he said he did not expect there to be many developments in the legal proceedings against Assange stateside until any issues regarding asylum and extradition are hashed out, mostly likely in a British court.
“We're a ways down the road before he would ever be brought here to face criminal charges,” Pollack said. ”Obviously, if and when, and I hope we never get to that point, if somehow he is brought here facing criminal charges, I would bring whatever resources we need to bare to litigate.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Selection of Zeldin to Head EPA Draws Surprise, Little Hope of Avoiding Deregulation
In Mafia Case, Justices Ponder: Is Murder Always Violent?
Will the 9th Circuit Still be Center Stage in Trump Policy Challenges?
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250