Chief Justice Roberts Rebuffs Trump After He Criticizes Judges Again
“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. said Wednesday, responding to new criticism from Trump about a judge in California who ruled against his asylum restrictions.
November 21, 2018 at 01:39 PM
3 minute read
Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi / ALM)
Updated 3:59 p.m.
In a rare rebuke, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. on Wednesday defended the nation's independent judiciary against President Donald Trump's attack on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and an “Obama judge” for delivering an “automatic loss” to cases brought by the Trump administration.
“We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges,” Roberts said in a statement issued by the court. “What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them. That independent judiciary is something we should all be thankful for.”
Roberts has been mostly silent after previous criticisms voiced by Trump against the judiciary, but Trump's angry statements Tuesday apparently crossed a line.
“I'm going to put in a major complaint, because you cannot win—if you're us—a case in the 9th Circuit and I think it's a disgrace,” Trump said as he left for Florida. He was responding to a question about the ruling issued by U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar of the Northern District of California ordering a resumption of accepting asylum claims regardless of where the claimants entered the United States.
“When people file—every case gets filed in the 9th Circuit because they know—that's not law. That's not what this country stands for,” Trump told reporters. “They file it in what's called the 9th Circuit. This was an Obama judge. And I'll tell you what, it's not going to happen like this anymore.”
Trump continued, “The 9th Circuit is really something we have to take a look at because it's — because it's not fair. People should not be allowed to immediately run to this very friendly circuit and file their case.”
Trump also said that when the asylum case makes its way to the Supreme Court, “we will win.”
Trump on Wednesday responded to Roberts on Twitter:
Sorry Chief Justice John Roberts, but you do indeed have “Obama judges,” and they have a much different point of view than the people who are charged with the safety of our country. It would be great if the 9th Circuit was indeed an “independent judiciary,” but if it is why……
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 21, 2018
The spat with Roberts isn't the first for Trump. The then-candidate bashed Roberts over his ruling that helped uphold the Obama-era Affordable Care Act. Trump called Roberts a “nightmare” for conservatives.
Read more:
Kavanaugh, Unlike Gorsuch, Stays Mum on Trump's Attacks on Federal Judges
President Trump Is Packing the Courts With Law Firm Partners
'Hard to Predict' Court Dynamics Sans Swing Justice, Kagan Says
Brett Kavanaugh Really Didn't Want to Talk About the Federalist Society
Kavanaugh Didn't Help Dispel Image of Justices as 'Junior Varsity Politicians'
New Book Tells Inside Stories of Feuding Justices, Anger Toward Trump
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
2 minute read
Weil, Loading Up on More Regulatory Talent, Adds SEC Asset Management Co-Chief
3 minute read
FTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
5 minute read
Supreme Court Will Hear Religious Parents' Bid to Opt Out of LGBTQ-Themed School Books
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
