Papadopoulos, Convicted Ex-Trump Adviser, Loses Bid to Delay Prison Term
"Papadopoulos has not identified any extenuating circumstances—nor is the court aware of any—that would overcome the presumption against granting such an eleventh-hour stay," U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss wrote Sunday.
November 25, 2018 at 12:32 PM
3 minute read
A former foreign policy adviser on the Trump presidential campaign who lied to authorities in the special counsel's Russia investigation must surrender Monday to begin a 14-day prison term, a Washington federal judge ruled Sunday.
George Papadopoulos, who was sentenced in September, had urged the court to delay the start of his prison sentence pending the outcome of a challenge to the power of the special counsel, Robert Mueller III, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
The appeals court heard arguments this month from a grand jury witness who contends the appointment of Mueller was unlawful. Lawyers for Papadopoulos had argued that any ruling against Mueller would undermine the prosecution and conviction of the false statements charge.
Two trial judges—Chief Judge Beryl Howell and Judge Dabney Friedrich—have concluded separately that Mueller was lawfully appointed, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss noted in his ruling Sunday.
“Chief Judge Howell and Judge Friedrich have both issued thorough and carefully reasoned opinions rejecting the arguments that Papadopoulos now champions,” Moss wrote. Papadopoulos, the judge said, failed to show how a ruling from the D.C. Circuit against Mueller would “likely” overturn Papadopoulos's conviction.
Papadopoulos, at the time of his sentencing, appeared contrite, and Moss pointed to the remorse when he ordered the 14-day prison term. Papadopoulos had faced up to six months in prison.
In the weeks since his sentencing, Papadopoulos has shown a change of heart, speaking out publicly against Mueller and hiring a new team of lawyers to challenge his conviction.
Prosecutors last week urged Moss not to delay the start of the prison term. “Here, as part of a favorable plea agreement, the defendant waived his appeal and did not file a timely notice. The defendant received what he bargained for, and holding him to it is not a hardship,” prosecutors said.
Moss said Papadopoulos has only himself to blame for the last-minute push to delay the start of his prison term.
The judge said “Papadopoulos has not identified any extenuating circumstances—nor is the court aware of any—that would overcome the presumption against granting such an eleventh-hour stay.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSplit DC Circuit Upholds Trespassing Charge Used in Hundreds of Jan. 6 Cases
When in Doubt: What's a Dubitante Opinion, and Why Do Judges Write Them?
Supreme Court Casts Skeptical Eye Over Death Penalty Appeal
Judges Support Proposed Rule Requiring Court's Approval to File Amicus Briefs
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250