'There's An App for That,' Sure, but Perhaps Not an Apple Victory at SCOTUS
The U.S. Justice Department backed Apple at the high court, but the justices appeared poised to let consumers pursue claims over app purchases.
November 26, 2018 at 03:08 PM
4 minute read
The popular meme says “there's an app for that,” but there may not be one for Apple Inc. as it searches for a win at the U.S. Supreme Court to shut down an antitrust lawsuit brought by iPhone consumers.
The consumer class action contends Apple's “wholly-owned, monopoly app store” overcharges for apps and distorts the market at the supply chain and at the retail chain.
In Apple v. Pepper, the tech company encountered resistance in the high court Monday as it argued that the 1977 decision Illinois Brick v. Illinois bars Apple customers from suing the company.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 2Wine, Dine and Grind (Through the Weekend): Summer Associates Thirst For Experience in 'Real Matters'
- 3'That's Disappointing': Only 11% of MDL Appointments Went to Attorneys of Color in 2023
- 4What We Know About the Kentucky Judge Killed in His Chambers
- 5'I'm Staying Everything': Texas Bankruptcy Judge Halts Talc Trials Against J&J
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250