FTC Is Pressed Over Matt Whitaker's Role Advising Company Accused of Fraud
“The staff has all the details. It's not a secret. They would be more than happy to provide a briefing,” FTC chair Joseph Simons said Tuesday at an oversight hearing in Washington.
November 27, 2018 at 06:32 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Senate Democrats are demanding information from the Federal Trade Commission about any past entanglement with the acting U.S. attorney general, Matthew Whitaker, in connection with his past role as an adviser to a company the agency accused of scamming inventors out of millions of dollars.
During an oversight hearing Tuesday, FTC Chairman Joseph Simons committed to having his staff brief senators on the agency's investigation of World Patent Marketing, an invention promotion business that was shut down over agency claims that it bilked customers and intimidated those who complained about the company. World Patent Marketing reached a settlement with the FTC in May that included a nearly $26 million judgment against the company.
Whitaker's legal work in private practice has faced intense scrutiny since his rise to the top of the Justice Department following the ouster of Jeff Sessions. Six months after being finalized, the World Patent Marketing settlement has drawn significant attention. Whitaker, a former U.S. attorney in Iowa, served on the World Patent Marketing's advisory board and described the company in 2014 as a “first-class organization.”
U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Connecticut, on Tuesday asked Simons whether Whitaker had been subpoenaed by the FTC. Simons, noting that the World Patent Marketing settlement predated his tenure—the former Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison partner joined the agency last year—said he has not “studied what subpoenas have been issued in that case.”
“The staff has all the details. It's not a secret. They would be more than happy to provide a briefing,” Simons said.
Blumenthal cited media reporting that Whitaker allegedly once contacted a World Patent Marketing consumer to say there would be “serious civil and criminal consequences” if the past customer continued to post negative reviews about the company.
Simons said he was not personally aware of facts that would substantiate the report. ”My staff has the facts,” he said.
“You would agree with me, would you not, that that kind of statement would be improper?” Blumenthal asked.
“That's troubling,” Simons said.
Whitaker has previously denied knowing about any fraudulent activity at the company. In his financial disclosure, he reported receiving $1,875 in legal fees from World Patent Marketing in the run-up to his Justice Department tenure.
A Justice Department spokesperson was not immediately reached for comment Tuesday.
“Acting attorney general Matt Whitaker has said he was not aware of any fraudulent activity. Any stories suggesting otherwise are false,” a Justice Department spokesperson told The Washington Post earlier this month in a spotlight about Whitaker's ties to World Patent Marketing.
How long Whitaker will remain at the helm of Main Justice is unknown. President Trump hasn't nominated a permanent replacement, and new members of Congress take their seats in January.
Meanwhile, Whitaker's appointment as acting U.S. attorney general faces myriad court challenges. Challengers contend Whitaker, who was a chief of staff before being named acting attorney general, is unlawfully at the helm. The Justice Department issued a memo recently that concluded Whitaker's appointment was legal.
Whitaker, before joining the Justice Department, was a critic of the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, a probe he now oversees. As a paid contributor for CNN, he called for limiting the scope of the investigation and said the special counsel, Robert Mueller III, would be crossing a “red line” if his team probed the finances of Trump and his family. Whitaker received $15,000 in “consulting fees” for his CNN commentary, according to his financial disclosure.
|Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250