Controversial Judicial Nominee From Ogletree Advances to Floor Vote
Thomas Farr's confirmation advanced after Vice President Mike Pence broke a 50-50 Senate tie.
November 28, 2018 at 01:57 PM
4 minute read
A controversial judicial nominee Thomas Farr cleared a procedural hurdle in his path to confirmation for a seat in the Eastern District of North Carolina on Wednesday, after his bid became mired in controversy over his past record on voting rights.
His confirmation advanced after Vice President Mike Pence broke a 50-50 Senate tie, clearing the way for a floor vote. All 49 Senate Democrats voted against cloture on Farr, with one Republican—outgoing Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Arizona—joining the bloc. One closely watched vote—Sen. Tim Scott, R-South Carolina—voted in favor of advancing Farr's nomination.
If he joins the bench, Farr will leave a private practice job in Raleigh, North Carolina. He has worked as a shareholder at labor and employment law firm Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart since 2004. In 2016, he earned over $610,000 in income, according to a disclosure he filed last year.
Farr, whom President Donald Trump nominated in July 2017, has faced a firestorm of controversy throughout his nomination, largely revolving around his past defense of voting restrictions. The Congressional Black Caucus last year described Farr as “the preeminent attorney for North Carolina Republicans seeking to curtail the voting rights of people of color.”
Senate Democrats—with all 49 united in their opposition to Farr—only needed to pick off one additional Senate Republican on Wednesday to block his nomination. Flake had previously announced he would vote against Farr's bid, holding out his vote until legislation meant to bolster special counsel Robert Mueller's job security receives a Senate vote.
Since Farr was first nominated last year, civil rights and progressive legal groups have opposed him over what they describe as a record of hostility to voting rights. Critics have cited, for example, his defense of a 2013 North Carolina voter identification law. A Fourth Circuit panel struck down the law, finding it targeted black voters with “almost surgical precision.” The Supreme Court did not take up Farr's appeal, which left the appeals court's ruling intact.
Farr's past work on the campaigns of former U.S. Sen. Jesse Helms of North Carolina, an opponent of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, has also drawn scrutiny. Farr represented Helms' campaign in 1992, when it sent postcards to mostly African-American voters that the Justice Department later said were designed to intimidate them from going to the polls.
“It is no exaggeration to say that had the White House deliberately sought to identify an attorney in North Carolina with a more hostile record on African-American voting rights and workers' rights than Thomas Farr, it could hardly have done so,” members of the Congressional Black Caucus wrote in their letter to the U.S. Senate last year, opposing his nomination.
“We believe that Mr. Farr's record raises serious questions regarding his commitment to equal justice under the law that disqualifies him from service on the federal bench,” they said.
The district court seat to which Farr has been nominated has been vacant since 2005, making it the country's longest federal judicial vacancy.
President Barack Obama nominated two African-American woman to the seat during his tenure; however, Republican Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina declined to return blue slips for either of those nominations, and neither received confirmation hearings during their nominations.
President George W. Bush previously nominated Farr to the seat, but his nomination did not advance under the then-Democratic majority in the Senate.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All4th Circuit Revives Workplace Retaliation Lawsuit Against Biden's HHS Secretary
3 minute read'Meet and Confer': Judge Seeks Speedy Resolution in Maryland Key Bridge Litigation
3 minute read'Ad Network Monopoly'?: YouTube CEO May Testify at Google's Second Antitrust Bench Trial
3 minute read'Vindication for the Soldiers': Syria Held Liable in US Army Wrongful-Deaths Case
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250