Update: Michael Cohen Pleads Guilty to Lying About Trump Real Estate Deal in Russia
Cohen appeared in Manhattan federal court Thursday morning, where he pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about discussions with then-candidate Donald Trump about a development project in Moscow.
November 29, 2018 at 10:30 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's former personal attorney, pleaded guilty Thursday morning to lying to Congress about the timeline of a Russian real estate project pursued by Trump during the 2016 election.
The new charges were brought by the office of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, with which Cohen is now cooperating.
According to court filings, Cohen provided written and oral testimony to the congressional investigations conducted by both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives into Russian interference in the presidential election won by Trump.
In his statements, Cohen said discussions inside Trump's company to possibly build in Moscow ended in January 2016. Further, Cohen stated he never agreed to travel to Russia in connection with the project and never considered asking Trump—identified as “Individual 1” in court documents—to do the same. Lastly, Cohen stated that he did not recall any communications with Russian officials about the project.
These statements were knowingly false, according to court filings.
Cohen's statements were meant to minimize Trump's links to the Moscow project while giving the false impression that discussions about the project ended before the Iowa presidential caucus in 2016, the first in the nation, in the hopes of limiting the ongoing Russia investigation.
In fact, prosecutors stated in their filing, the Moscow project discussion did not end in January 2016 and was discussed multiple times within the Trump Organization thereafter. Cohen was discussing possibly obtaining Russian governmental approval for the project as late as June. Likewise, Cohen discussed the status and progress of the project with Trump on more than three occasions, according to prosecutors.
➤➤ Keep up with Trump's legal team and the latest maneuvers in the Mueller investigation with Trump Watch by Ellis Kim. Sign up here.
Cohen also made plans to travel to Russia and asked Trump about the possibility of traveling there as well during the presidential campaign, according to court filings. In May, Cohen received communications indicating a Russian official wanted to meet with him the following month in St. Petersburg, where he could potentially meet directly with Russian President Vladmir Putin or another top Russian official. Cohen took steps to possibly make the trip before backing out in mid-June, according to court filings.
Additionally, Cohen's statement about not communicating with Russian officials was knowingly false, as he was in touch with the office of Putin's press secretary, Dmitry Peskov. Court documents state the Cohen reached out in January 2016 about the project and spoke with Peskov's assistant about possibly getting help to move it forward.
Cohen's appearance in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Thursday marks the second time he's pleaded guilty to charges. In August, Cohen pleaded guilty to paying hush money to women who alleged they had sexual relations with the future president.
Cohen's attorney, Guy Petrillo, did not respond to a request for comment.
A spokesman for the special counsel's office, Peter Carr, said the office would not be commenting further on the case.
According to The Associated Press, Trump responded to the news Thursday morning, telling reporters on the west lawn of the White House that Cohen is a “weak person” who was “lying” to get a reduced sentence.
Additional reporting was provided by Washington, D.C.-based reporter Ellis Kim.
Here is the new criminal information filed in the Southern District of New York:
And read Cohen's plea agreement here:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute read5th Circuit Judge Jones Slams Proposal for Greater Amicus Brief Funding Disclosure
'Health Care Behemoth'?: DOJ Seeks Injunction Blocking $3.3B UnitedHealth Merger Proposal
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250