Justice Dept. Lawyer Faces Wrath of Judge Who's Still Weighing CVS-Aetna Deal
“You need to slow this down,” U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington said Thursday. “You're like a freight train out of control.” CVS and Aetna announced the completion of their merger on Wednesday, following the US Justice Department's approval in October.
November 29, 2018 at 02:20 PM
4 minute read
A Washington federal judge excoriated a U.S. Justice Department lawyer Thursday for keeping him “in the dark” about the consummation of CVS Health's $69 billion acquisition of Aetna Inc. and urged the companies to wait for a final judgment on the deal before integrating their operations.
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, appearing livid at times, accused the Justice Department and the two companies of treating his antitrust review of the acquisition as a “rubber stamp operation.” And he expressed concern about how the integration of CVS and Aetna, which completed their merger Wednesday, would be unwound in the event that he rejects their merger.
“You need to slow this down,” Leon said. “You're like a freight train out of control.”
The Justice Department approved the deal in October on the condition that Aetna sell its Medicare Part D prescription drug plan business.
Leon had scheduled Thursday's hearing in response to the Justice Department's request to appoint Julie Myers Wood, chief executive of the the monitoring firm Guidepost Solutions, to oversee the insurance giant divestiture of that business to WellCare Health Plans Inc. After receiving the motion to appoint Myers as the monitor, Leon said he “kind of got this uneasy feeling about being kept in the dark, kind of like a mushroom.”
Leon asked Justice Department lawyer Jay Owen about the “practical consequences” of the merger. When Owen said CVS and Aetna had closed their deal, Leon sarcastically replied, “Thanks for telling me.”
Leon, who approved AT&T Inc.'s acquisition of Time Warner in June, stressed that he had not issued a final judgment approving the CVS-Aetna merger and noted that the public comment period on the Justice Department's settlement allowing the deal was not set to close until mid-December. The judge pointed to what he described as a “140-page” opposition filed by the American Medical Association, saying that he would take comments and other evidence into account before handing down a final ruling on the acquisition.
“Let's make it clear, Mr. Owen: This court's not a rubber stamp,” Leon said.
“Who knows where this is going. No one knows,” Leon said later in the hearing. “And you all are treating this like a rubber stamp operation.”
Owen declined to comment after the hearing.
Lawyers for CVS and Aetna were not called to speak during the hearing. CVS was represented in court Thursday by Dechert partner Rani Habash. Davis Polk & Wardwell partners Howard Shelanski and Jesse Solomon appeared for Aetna.
Leon suggested his ruling might not come for several months. He asked, “If I rule against it, how do you untangle seven months of integration?”
“Very difficult,” Leon said, answering his own question.
Owen described the possibility of the deal's rejection as a “business risk” that the companies were bearing.
Leon urged the Justice Department to meet with Aetna and CVS and consider how to account for the possibility of the merger being rejected, before scheduling a follow-up hearing for Dec. 3.
When Owens asked if Leon would still appoint Myers to oversee Aetna's divestiture, the judge said the companies also needed to consider what ramifications a denial of the merger would have for the insurer's planned sale of the prescription drug plan business to WellCare.
“You need to think about that, frankly,” Leon said. “See you Monday.”
Read more:
AT&T Judge Richard Leon Wasn't Mocking Trump! Exclamation Points Are His Mark!
Sidley Austin's Peter Keisler Takes on More Formal Role for AT&T in Antitrust Battle
DC Judge Puts Cork in Wine Bar's Suit Against Trump
CVS to Pay $40M for Insurance Education to Gain Approval of Aetna Deal
Judge Leon Denies Fusion GPS Bid to Block House Subpoena for Bank Records
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRestoring Antitrust: Returning to the Consumer Welfare Standard
Antitrust in Trump 2.0: Expect Gap Filling from State Attorneys General
6 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Considerations for Establishing or Denying a Texas Partnership to Invest in Real Estate
- 2In-House AI Adoption Stalls Despite Rising Business Pressures
- 3Texas Asks Trump DOJ to Reject Housing Enforcement
- 4Ideas We Should Borrow: A Legislative Wishlist for NJ Trusts and Estates
- 5Canadian Private Equity Firms Are Eyeing Tech Sector
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250