READ: James Comey Just Went to Court to Quash House Subpoena
Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch both face subpoenas from House Republicans.
November 29, 2018 at 05:00 PM
3 minute read
Updated at 7:29 p.m.
Former FBI Director James Comey asked a Washington, D.C., federal court on Thursday to block Republican lawmakers' demand that he testify in a closed-door hearing.
Delivering on a promise Comey previewed on Twitter, his lawyers filed a motion late Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia seeking to quash a subpoena issued Wednesday by outgoing House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Virginia.
Goodlatte's subpoena demanded Comey testify in a closed-door deposition on Dec. 3. It was issued as part of House Republicans' efforts to probe federal law enforcement's handling of the investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's emails.
“Mr. Comey asks this Court's intervention not to avoid giving testimony but to prevent the Joint Committee from using the pretext of a closed interview to peddle a distorted, partisan political narrative about the Clinton and Russian investigations through selective leaks,” the filing said.
The filing from Comey's attorneys says the former FBI director “welcomes the opportunity to testify publicly about the Clinton and Russian investigations as he has done previously numerous times,” as Comey had previously tweeted.
The bid to quash the effort, filed by Dechert partners Vincent Cohen and David Kelley, said the subpoena exceeded “a proper legislative purpose” in violation of congressional rules, and “unduly prejudices and harasses the witness.” Comey's attorneys have also asked the court to stay the deposition while the effort to quash the subpoena is litigated.
While the move marks an escalation in the ongoing drama between Republican lawmakers and the former FBI director, a court fight could end up fizzling out. Republicans will lose the majority in the U.S. House of Representatives in January, which will effectively block them from forcing Comey to testify.
Comey's attorney previewed the fight last week: “While the authority for Congressional subpoenas is broad, it does not cover the right to misuse closed hearings as a political stunt to promote political as opposed to legislative agendas,” Kelley said.
“Mr. Comey embraces and welcomes a hearing open to the public, but the subpoena issued yesterday represents an abuse of process, a divergence from House rules and its presumption of transparency. Accordingly, Mr. Comey will resist in Court this abuse of process,” he added.
U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, appointed by President Donald Trump last year, was assigned the Comey case.
Read Comey's motion below:
Read more:
Former AG Lynch Backed by Ted Wells Amid Congressional Subpoena
Quotable Matt Whitaker: Nothing Sticks to Trump, 'Even Being a Misogynist'
Meanwhile, These Other Memos—Written By James Comey—Will Remain Secret
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250