Wisconsin Solicitor General, a Former Gibson Dunn Associate, May Be Casualty of Political Warfare
The Wisconsin bill runs contrary to a decadeslong trend toward increasing the number of state solicitors general nationwide to improve the advocacy and professionalism of state litigators.
December 13, 2018 at 11:18 AM
4 minute read
The fierce political battle in Wisconsin over Republican measures that could weaken the power of the incoming Democratic governor has taken down an unexpected target: the state's solicitor general.
The package of bills passed in advance of Democratic Gov.-elect Tony Evers taking office includes a provision that would abolish the position of solicitor general, who argues before state and federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court, and his office, which includes five other lawyers. Current Gov. Scott Walker has yet to sign the bills.
Misha TseytlinIf he does, Wisconsin Solicitor General Misha Tseytlin, a former clerk to Justice Anthony Kennedy and former associate at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, may be the first and last solicitor general the state has had.
He might have been out of a job anyway with the election of a Democratic attorney general as boss, but legislation abolishing the position altogether has an undeniable finality. Tseytlin did not respond to a request for comment.
The bill also runs contrary to a decadeslong trend toward increasing the number of state solicitors general nationwide to improve the advocacy and professionalism of state litigators. Only 10 states now lack state solicitors. Wisconsin would be the 11th, and may be the first state to end the innovation by legislation. As with the other states that have no solicitor general, appellate lawyers in the state justice department would likely pick up the slack.
But why would the solicitor general's office, created in 2015 by Republican Attorney General Brad Schimel, be a casualty of wide-ranging political conflict?
Strangely enough, the answer may be the history of Democratic animosity toward the solicitor general's office, caused in part by Tseytlin's conservative advocacy in major cases.
He argued and won two Supreme Court cases on behalf of Wisconsin: the regulatory takings case Murr v. Wisconsin in 2016, and Gill v. Whitford, the political gerrymandering case, in 2017. Tseytlin's official profile notes that in his previous job as West Virginia's general counsel, he “specialized in litigation challenging unconstitutional and otherwise unlawful overreach by the federal government.”
After the office was created, a Democratic legislator grumbled that it would become “a mini right-wing law firm in the attorney general's office.” Tseytlin oversees a chief deputy solicitor, three deputy solicitors and an assistant solicitor. His chief deputy, Ryan Walsh, was a former clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia and a Jones Day associate.
On the campaign trail, Democratic Attorney General candidate Josh Kaul said he would keep the position of solicitor general but would restructure the six-lawyer office if elected, which he was. Kaul said the cases the office has taken on are “highly partisan and are not serving the interests of Wisconsinites.”
It may be that the Republican legislators, in the midst of their other agenda items, saw fit to give Democrat Kaul more than what he wanted: no solicitor general's office at all.
With the shoe on the other foot, that void may hamper the new administration's ability to litigate cases taking positions that Republicans, not Democrats, may soon view as partisan.
|Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute readRegulatory Upheaval Is Coming. How Businesses Prepare and Respond Will Separate Winners and Losers
3 GOP States Join Paid Sick Leave Movement, Passing Ballot Measures by Wide Margins
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250