DC Firms Might Lag in 2018 Results, But Optimistic for 2019
The dip in regulatory enforcement in Washington meant lower gains for firms in the capital. But some expect 2019 and the current political climate to prove lucrative to Washington law firms.
December 26, 2018 at 09:48 AM
4 minute read
The jury remains out on how the Washington, D.C., legal market fared in 2018 with some analyses expecting the nation's capital to lag behind other regions nationwide.
A Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group flash survey of the third quarter sounded the alarm that D.C. showed the lowest level of revenue growth among all of the 11 U.S. regions the survey covered. Citi's survey did not include national and global firms that participate in D.C. but are based elsewhere, and it excludes some other new entrants. But there is reason to think Citi's findings may equally apply to those firms.
D.C. has faced more challenges than other regions because of changes in the level of regulatory and enforcement work coming out of President Donald Trump's administration, said Lisa Smith, principal of consulting firm Fairfax Associates' Washington office. Smith said the market is likely “down a little bit” because there has not been as much as enforcement as usual and the Trump administration is not fully staffed.
Smith said firms with a broad practice mix that are not as reliant on regulatory and enforcement work are well positioned for the future. While Smith said she knows firms are “thinking about what a downturn in the economy of legal services” could mean for their business, she said she expected much of the challenges present now to be short-lived and a “function of the current administration.”
But for some firms, the climate in Washington is making them all the more needed.
Tony Pierce, the partner in charge of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld's D.C. office, said revenue is up at the firm and 2018 will be a good year. While Pierce said he expects the overall economy to slow down, the “dysfunction” in Washington has been “certainly good for Akin Gump.” He expects the firm to continue benefiting from the chaos wrought by divided government.
“I think that you're going to see the business community need to be involved in what is happening on the Hill to a greater extent just to protect their interest and shape policy the way they want to see it,” Pierce said, looking ahead to 2019. “I also think you're going to see an uptick in congressional investigations where I do not subscribe to the belief that Democrats are only going to investigate the administration. I think there will be investigations that relate very much to the business community and its connection to the administration.”
Akin Gump will also join the growing trend of Big Law firms on the move in Washington next year. Akin Gump is moving only a few blocks within its DuPont Circle neighborhood—Pierce said the firm expects to make the move May 4th—but others are relocating to Pennsylvania Avenue or nearer to the Potomac River, at the Wharf. Among the firms relocating to Pennsylvania Avenue are Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton; Miles & Stockbridge; and Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr. Fish & Richardson already moved to the Wharf in 2018 and Michael Best & Friedrich is following in 2019. Williams & Connolly, meanwhile, has said it is heading to the Wharf, too, and will make the move in 2022.
Smith said she thinks firms' relocations are primarily responsive to where there are large spaces suitable for law firms and that firms are not trying to send a message by moving away from K Street.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
4 minute readTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 12 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
- 2Trade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
- 3Rule of Law: Is Big Law Too Shortsighted?
- 4The Empty Promise of ‘Dubin v. United States’
- 5Weil Partner Exits Raise Questions About Future Firm Leadership
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250