DOJ Cites 'Full Cooperation' in Declining FCPA Case Against Plantronics
The company had also taken steps to improve its compliance systems and provided “full cooperation,” which included making employees available for interviews and translating business documents.
December 27, 2018 at 01:19 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Justice Department has closed an investigation into the audio headset maker Plantronics Inc. without criminal prosecution, citing the company's “full cooperation” with a foreign bribery investigation involving a communications technology firm that it acquired this year.
In settlements with the DOJ and U.S. securities regulators, the Santa Cruz, California-based company agreed to pay $36 million to resolve allegations involving Polycom, which Plantronics acquired in July. Plantronics, represented by Foley & Lardner and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, said the alleged misconduct predated its $2 billion acquisition of Polycom and that all of the Polycom employees involved had left the company by the time the deal closed in July.
The Securities and Exchange Commission said that, from 2006 until at least mid-2014, an executive and senior managers at Polycom's subsidiary in China provided steep discounts to the company's distributors and resellers with the understanding that they would put the money saved toward bribing government officials. “Throughout this period,” the SEC said, Polycom “lacked an effective anti-corruption compliance program with regard to its Chinese sales operations.”
Plantronics received a declination letter from the Justice Department explaining that prosecutors had opted against bringing charges because the company promptly reported Polycom's past misconduct and cooperated with the investigation.
The Justice Department's move made Plantronics at least the fourth company this year to receive a declination letter from the Justice Department under its policy for rewarding voluntary disclosure of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a federal law prohibiting bribery meant to build business overseas.
The policy, outlined in a November 2017 speech by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, established a presumption that no charges would be filed against companies that promptly self-report and address violations of the anti-bribery law and then fully cooperate with investigators.
Rosenstein said the policy was intended to provide “greater certainty” to companies grappling with whether to voluntarily disclose misconduct to the Justice Department.
“We cannot eliminate all uncertainty,” Rosenstein said. “Preserving a measure of prosecutorial discretion is central to ensuring the exercise of justice. But with this new policy, we strike the balance in favor of greater clarity about our decision-making process.”
In May, Rosenstein rolled out a new policy that said the Justice Department would also seek to avoid “piling on” corporate defendants, a move aimed to “discourage disproportionate enforcement of laws by multiple authorities.”
A report from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr said “it appears the DOJ has been moving in the direction of the policy by crediting companies for penalties paid in other jurisdictions.” Indeed, DOJ's declination letter in Polycom's case noted the company had agreed to pay $10.6 million in disgorgement to the SEC.
In its latest declination letter, the Justice Department noted that Polycom had terminated eight employees involved in the misconduct and discipline 18 others. The company had also taken steps to improve its compliance systems and provided “full cooperation,” which included making employees available for interviews and translating business documents.
Plantronics said it contacted the federal government after discovering “evidence of possible improper behavior on the part of former employees” at Polycom's subsidiary in China.
“We are very pleased that the investigation into some of Polycom's foreign operations has concluded,” Plantronics CEO Joe Burton said in a prepared statement. “Plantronics has been, and remains, committed to operating with ethical and financial integrity, and we look forward to the future with Polycom.”
Foley & Lardner partner Rohan Virginkar, a former prosecutor in DOJ's FCPA unit, and Caz Hashemi, a Palo Alto-based partner at Wilson Sonsini, represented Plantronics. Neither lawyer responded to requests for comment Thursday.
Read DOJ's declination letter below:
Read more:
Rod Rosenstein Expands Power to Give Cooperation Credit in White-Collar Cases
Ex-Morgan Stanley Lawyer Alleges Retaliation After Raising Corruption Concerns
Credit Suisse Anti-Corruption Policies Weren't 'Meaningfully Enforced': SEC
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 2FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
- 3Chief Judge Joins Panel Exploring Causes for Public's Eroding Faith in NY Legal System
- 4Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 5Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250