DOJ Cites 'Full Cooperation' in Declining FCPA Case Against Plantronics
The company had also taken steps to improve its compliance systems and provided “full cooperation,” which included making employees available for interviews and translating business documents.
December 27, 2018 at 01:19 PM
4 minute read
The U.S. Justice Department has closed an investigation into the audio headset maker Plantronics Inc. without criminal prosecution, citing the company's “full cooperation” with a foreign bribery investigation involving a communications technology firm that it acquired this year.
In settlements with the DOJ and U.S. securities regulators, the Santa Cruz, California-based company agreed to pay $36 million to resolve allegations involving Polycom, which Plantronics acquired in July. Plantronics, represented by Foley & Lardner and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, said the alleged misconduct predated its $2 billion acquisition of Polycom and that all of the Polycom employees involved had left the company by the time the deal closed in July.
The Securities and Exchange Commission said that, from 2006 until at least mid-2014, an executive and senior managers at Polycom's subsidiary in China provided steep discounts to the company's distributors and resellers with the understanding that they would put the money saved toward bribing government officials. “Throughout this period,” the SEC said, Polycom “lacked an effective anti-corruption compliance program with regard to its Chinese sales operations.”
Plantronics received a declination letter from the Justice Department explaining that prosecutors had opted against bringing charges because the company promptly reported Polycom's past misconduct and cooperated with the investigation.
The Justice Department's move made Plantronics at least the fourth company this year to receive a declination letter from the Justice Department under its policy for rewarding voluntary disclosure of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a federal law prohibiting bribery meant to build business overseas.
The policy, outlined in a November 2017 speech by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, established a presumption that no charges would be filed against companies that promptly self-report and address violations of the anti-bribery law and then fully cooperate with investigators.
Rosenstein said the policy was intended to provide “greater certainty” to companies grappling with whether to voluntarily disclose misconduct to the Justice Department.
“We cannot eliminate all uncertainty,” Rosenstein said. “Preserving a measure of prosecutorial discretion is central to ensuring the exercise of justice. But with this new policy, we strike the balance in favor of greater clarity about our decision-making process.”
In May, Rosenstein rolled out a new policy that said the Justice Department would also seek to avoid “piling on” corporate defendants, a move aimed to “discourage disproportionate enforcement of laws by multiple authorities.”
A report from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr said “it appears the DOJ has been moving in the direction of the policy by crediting companies for penalties paid in other jurisdictions.” Indeed, DOJ's declination letter in Polycom's case noted the company had agreed to pay $10.6 million in disgorgement to the SEC.
In its latest declination letter, the Justice Department noted that Polycom had terminated eight employees involved in the misconduct and discipline 18 others. The company had also taken steps to improve its compliance systems and provided “full cooperation,” which included making employees available for interviews and translating business documents.
Plantronics said it contacted the federal government after discovering “evidence of possible improper behavior on the part of former employees” at Polycom's subsidiary in China.
“We are very pleased that the investigation into some of Polycom's foreign operations has concluded,” Plantronics CEO Joe Burton said in a prepared statement. “Plantronics has been, and remains, committed to operating with ethical and financial integrity, and we look forward to the future with Polycom.”
Foley & Lardner partner Rohan Virginkar, a former prosecutor in DOJ's FCPA unit, and Caz Hashemi, a Palo Alto-based partner at Wilson Sonsini, represented Plantronics. Neither lawyer responded to requests for comment Thursday.
Read DOJ's declination letter below:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Weiss’ Shanmugam Joins 11th Circuit Fight Over False Claims Act’s Constitutionality
‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readUS Reviewer of Foreign Transactions Sees More Political, Policy Influence, Say Observers
'Unlawful Release'?: Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 2'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 3Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
- 4As a New Year Dawns, the Value of Florida’s Revised Mediation Laws Comes Into Greater Focus
- 5Managing Partner Vindicated in Disciplinary Proceeding Brought by Former Associate
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250