Texas Judge Stays His ACA Ruling, but Adds an Appeal Is Unlikely to Succeed
In issuing a stay, U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor said most people have already bought their health insurance plans for 2019.
December 30, 2018 at 07:50 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in Texas who declared the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional earlier in December stayed his ruling pending an appeal since residents in many states have already purchased their health insurance plans for 2019.
U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor of the Northern District of Texas broadly upheld his initial Dec. 14 ruling, but said Americans would face great uncertainty during the appeal without a stay. O'Connor did say the states intervening to defend the ACA failed to show a likelihood they could succeed on appeal at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
In entering a partial final judgment and stay, O'Connor said Congress can sever the individual mandate from the ACA, but that the courts cannot do that. O'Connor added that congressional intent clearly indicated lawmakers did not intend to sever the individual mandate.
“The more courts step into breaches for Congress, the more courts will be called upon to step into breaches for Congress,” O'Connor wrote Saturday. “That would represent a fundamental shift in the Constitution's careful balancing of powers—not only on the Judiciary-Legislature plane, but also on the citizen-government plane.”
O'Connor's initial 55-page ruling issued Dec. 14 found that last year's congressional action eliminating the penalty imposed by the ACA's individual mandate made the whole law unconstitutional. O'Connor's decision said the demise of the mandate rendered the entire law invalid because it could not be severed from the mandate.
Democratic attorneys general who intervened in the case immediately vowed to appeal to the Fifth Circuit, putting the ACA on the path to review in the next year or so by the U.S. Supreme Court, which upheld the law in 2012.
O'Connor's underlying ruling came after “health insurers have already locked in benefits and prices for 2019 health coverage and are almost done with ordinary applicant enrollment for 2019 coverage,” according to affiliate publication Benefits Pro.
The 17 state attorneys general defending the ACA in lieu of the DOJ, which announced in June it would not defend the ACA, said O'Connor's decision lacked clarity, and filed an expedited motion seeking to continue the defense of the ACA. The motion also asked O'Connor to certify the opinion so it could be immediately appealed, or to stay the ruling pending an appeal.
Read the order:
Read more:
'Embarrassingly Bad,' 'Unmoored': Legal Scholars Bash Texas Judge's ACA Takedown
DOJ, With 'Regret,' Says Shutdown Complicates Court Orders and Deadlines
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readThree Akin Sports Lawyers Jump to Employment Firm Littler Mendelson
Trending Stories
- 1'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
- 2Polsinelli Picks Up Corporate Health Care Partner From Greenberg Traurig in LA
- 3Kirkland Lands in Phila., but Rate Pressure May Limit the High-Flying Firm's Growth Prospects
- 4Davis Wright Tremaine Turns to Gen AI To Teach Its Associates Legal Writing
- 5'Battle of the Experts': Bridgeport Jury Awards Defense Verdict to Stamford Hospital
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.