Justice Alito 'Unrecuses' for 9th Time, Rejoining Oracle Copyright Case
Because of a family inheritance several years ago, Alito and his wife have had holdings in numerous corporations, unlike most other justices. He has sold several of the stocks over time.
January 03, 2019 at 02:08 PM
3 minute read
Justice Samuel Alito Jr. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi / ALM
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito Jr., who until now recused himself in a pending copyright case, will participate after all, the court announced Thursday.
The case is Rimini Street v. Oracle USA, and Alito's most recent financial disclosure indicates he owned between $15,001 and $50,000 in Oracle stock. He sold parts of his Oracle holdings in 2017, and recused himself when the court granted review last September. He apparently sold the rest of the stock in time to participate in the case. Argument is set for Jan. 14.
The online docket now states, “Justice Alito is no longer recused in this case.”
At stake in Rimini is whether the meaning of “full costs” awarded to a prevailing party in a copyright cases is limited to taxable costs or also authorizes nontaxable costs. Federal appeals courts are divided over the issue.
Alito has “unrecused” nine times in the past, according to a search of the court's online docket.
Because of a family inheritance several years ago, Alito and his wife have had holdings in numerous corporations, unlike most other justices. He has sold several of the stocks over time, often in anticipation of an oral argument that posed a conflict of interest.
That practice has been made easier by a federal law that allows judges to shed stocks to avoid conflicts of interest without incurring capital gains taxes, an exemption that members of Congress also enjoy.
The justice also “unrecused” himself in another pending case, Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Albrecht, which will be argued Jan. 7. Alito, who owned Merck stock, belatedly realized he had a conflict in September 2017 and stepped aside, but he rejoined the case in October 2018.
Read more:
Supreme Court Justices Continue to Shed Stock Holdings, New Disclosures Show
Two Surprise Supreme Court Orders Show Why Recusals Matter
The Mystery Behind the Supreme Court's Dismissal of a Pending Case
New Disclosures Show Noel Francisco's Stock Sales Before SCOTUS Term
Justice Alito 'Unrecuses' in Upcoming Patent Case
The Gaps That Led Chief Justice Roberts to Miss a Stock Conflict
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
SEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute read
Sidley Adds Ex-DOJ Criminal Division Deputy Leader, Paul Hastings Adds REIT Partner, in Latest DC Hiring
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
