Banking Nearly $2M at Covington, Kyl Rejoins Firm's Public Policy Group
Former Senator Jon Kyl has ping-ponged twice now between the U.S. Senate and Covington & Burling.
January 07, 2019 at 03:31 PM
3 minute read
Jon Kyl, who briefly rejoined the U.S. Senate last year, has arrived back at Covington & Burling, the law firm where he made about $1.86 million in the last two years, according to newly public disclosure documents.
Kyl on Monday rejoined Covington as senior counsel in its public policy practice.
Kyl initially joined Covington in early 2013 in the same position after retiring from the U.S. Senate as the second-highest ranking Republican senator. He remained at the firm, handling high-stakes lobbying and advocacy matters for top corporate clients, until September 2018, when Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey appointed him to return to the U.S. Senate to fill the vacancy created by the death of U.S. Sen. John McCain.
Kyl served in the U.S. Senate for about four months in 2018, resigning Dec. 31.
According to an ethics disclosure form made available Jan. 3, Kyl reported that his top sources of compensation included Covington clients such as Anheuser-Busch InBev, Facebook, mining company Freeport-McMoRan Inc., H&R Block, Merck & Co. Inc., MGM Resorts International, Northrop Grumman Corp., Walmart and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, a trade group known as PhRMA,
Kyl's ethics disclosure also reported income from San Diego-based semiconductor company Qualcomm. In March, Covington touted it “secured a U.S. presidential order” compelling Broadcom Ltd. to abandon its proposed hostile takeover of Qualcomm. President Donald Trump, in blocking the bid, cited national security concerns at the time.
Kyl, in his ethics disclosure, also reported income from Judicial Crisis Network, a conservative political campaign organization that funded ads supporting Judge Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Before he returned to the Senate, Kyl served as lead “sherpa” for the confirmation of Kavanaugh, tasked with shepherding Trump's pick through the Senate.
His ethics disclosure said he was withholding the names of nine clients, citing bar rules.
A Covington spokesman told ALM that Kyl was not available for an interview Monday. In a statement, Timothy Hester, Covington's chair, said he expects Kyl “can make important contributions in a range of matters, particularly for clients in the technology, life sciences and defense sectors who may face numerous policy challenges in Congress and the executive branch.”
Yet Kyl will have some limitations. Under ethics rules, former U.S. senators cannot directly lobby for two years. Covington said Kyl “will focus on matters of policy and strategy for the firm's clients.”
Besides his law firm income, Kyl also reported about $26,500 in board compensation and $128,912 from Arizona State University, where he has taught undergraduate and law school classes, according to his ethics disclosure. The disclosure form said his reported income represents totals from 2017 and 2018.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
GOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 2The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 3November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 4Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
- 5How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250