Gibson Dunn, Reporters Committee Ask Courts to Unseal Records in Apparent Mueller Subpoena Fight
A Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher team headed by Theodore Boutrous Jr. is asking the U.S. Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit to unseal briefs and transcripts involving a contempt order apparently tied to the special counsel's Russia investigation.
January 09, 2019 at 05:52 PM
3 minute read
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is asking to unseal court records in the legal fight over a contempt order against a foreign state-owned corporation refusing to comply with a grand jury subpoena apparently tied to Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation.
A Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher team headed by Theodore Boutrous Jr. filed motions in both the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Wednesday claiming that sealing orders in the subpoena fight have been overbroad. The Reporters Committee is asking for redacted copies of briefs, transcripts and other documents filed thus far and for any future proceedings to be open to the public.
“That this appeal arises out of contempt proceedings does not eradicate the First Amendment right,” wrote the Gibson Dunn lawyers. “In the event the Court grants certiorari, RCFP respectfully requests that the Court direct the filing of publicly redacted versions of all merits briefs, that any oral argument be held publicly, and that a redacted oral argument transcript and recording be publicly filed,” they wrote.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday restored a contempt order in the case but has not addressed the merits of an underlying decision by the D.C. Circuit that said the unidentified corporation must comply with the grand jury subpoena. The Washington Post reported Tuesday that the company involved is a foreign financial institution. On Wednesday, CNN reported that Alston & Bird is involved in challenging the grand jury subpoena.
In an emailed statement Wednesday, Boutrous said the First Amendment protects the public's right to observe appellate proceedings. “We are hopeful that the D.C. Circuit and Supreme Court will grant to the public the widest access possible under these circumstances,” he said. “There is intense interest in these proceedings—all of which appear to affect matters of grave national import. This is precisely the interest the First Amendment's right of public access was meant to protect,” he said.
Gibson Dunn and Boutrous previously represented CNN and reporter Jim Acosta in a successful challenge to the Trump administration's decision to suspend Acosta's access to the White House.
Read the Reporters Committee's Supreme Court Brief:
Read the Reporters Committee's D.C. Circuit Brief:
Read more:
Justices Restore Contempt Order Against Corporation Defying Apparent Mueller Subpoena
What Happens If Mystery DC Circuit Grand Jury Case Reaches the Supreme Court?
DC Circuit Just Delivered Blow to Company Fighting Apparent Mueller Subpoena
Judge Orders Trump to Restore CNN Reporter's Access to White House
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readPrivate Equity Giant KKR Refiles SDNY Countersuit in DOJ Premerger Filing Row
3 minute readSeveral Big Law Firms Saw Year-Over-Year Lobbying Revenue Growth in 2024
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pro Hac Vice in Georgia: Rule Change for Nonresident Attorneys
- 2The Benefits of E-Filing for Affordable, Effortless and Equal Access to Justice
- 3AI and Social Media Fakes: Are You Protecting Your Brand?
- 4A Primer on Using Third-Party Depositions To Prove Your Case at Trial
- 5‘Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission’: Another Consequence of 'Hobby Lobby'?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250