Gibson Dunn, Reporters Committee Ask Courts to Unseal Records in Apparent Mueller Subpoena Fight
A Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher team headed by Theodore Boutrous Jr. is asking the U.S. Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit to unseal briefs and transcripts involving a contempt order apparently tied to the special counsel's Russia investigation.
January 09, 2019 at 05:52 PM
3 minute read
The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press is asking to unseal court records in the legal fight over a contempt order against a foreign state-owned corporation refusing to comply with a grand jury subpoena apparently tied to Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation.
A Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher team headed by Theodore Boutrous Jr. filed motions in both the U.S. Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Wednesday claiming that sealing orders in the subpoena fight have been overbroad. The Reporters Committee is asking for redacted copies of briefs, transcripts and other documents filed thus far and for any future proceedings to be open to the public.
“That this appeal arises out of contempt proceedings does not eradicate the First Amendment right,” wrote the Gibson Dunn lawyers. “In the event the Court grants certiorari, RCFP respectfully requests that the Court direct the filing of publicly redacted versions of all merits briefs, that any oral argument be held publicly, and that a redacted oral argument transcript and recording be publicly filed,” they wrote.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday restored a contempt order in the case but has not addressed the merits of an underlying decision by the D.C. Circuit that said the unidentified corporation must comply with the grand jury subpoena. The Washington Post reported Tuesday that the company involved is a foreign financial institution. On Wednesday, CNN reported that Alston & Bird is involved in challenging the grand jury subpoena.
In an emailed statement Wednesday, Boutrous said the First Amendment protects the public's right to observe appellate proceedings. “We are hopeful that the D.C. Circuit and Supreme Court will grant to the public the widest access possible under these circumstances,” he said. “There is intense interest in these proceedings—all of which appear to affect matters of grave national import. This is precisely the interest the First Amendment's right of public access was meant to protect,” he said.
Gibson Dunn and Boutrous previously represented CNN and reporter Jim Acosta in a successful challenge to the Trump administration's decision to suspend Acosta's access to the White House.
Read the Reporters Committee's Supreme Court Brief:
Read the Reporters Committee's D.C. Circuit Brief:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readWill Khan Resign? FTC Chair Isn't Saying Whether She'll Stick Around After Giving Up Gavel
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250