'There Is Real Hardship Being Felt By Innocent Federal Employees': DC Judge
"I empathize with the plaintiffs' positions. They are not the ones at fault here," U.S. District Judge Richard Leon says in his written ruling in a shutdown suit from federal employees. Leon earlier this week ruled from the bench, denying a temporary restraining order.
January 18, 2019 at 05:28 PM
3 minute read
U.S. District Judge Richard Leon this week refused to allow federal workers to resist Trump administration orders to report to duty unpaid during the partial government shutdown. The order, delivered from the bench, was a setback for hundreds of thousands of workers who are required, or being told, to report to work with no compensation.
Leon on Friday issued a six-page written ruling in which he expressed empathy for the plight of federal employees as the shutdown, now the longest in the nation's modern history, drags on. Leon's ruling came in consolidated cases that involve labor unions and individual federal employees who allege their forced work for no pay violates federal law.
Here's a snippet from Leon's written decision:
“I empathize with the plaintiffs' positions. They are not the ones at fault here. Indeed, the judiciary is dealing with the same realities that the executive branch is facing. I have no doubt whatsoever that there is real hardship being felt by innocent federal employees across the country right now.”
Leon went on: “But I want to make something very clear: The judiciary is not just another source of leverage to be tapped in the ongoing squabble between the political branches. We are an independent, co-equal branch of government, and whether or not we can afford to keep the lights on, our oath is to the Constitution and the faithful application of the law. In the final analysis, the shutdown is a political problem. It does not, and can not, change this court's limited role.”
Leon refused to issue a temporary restraining order, saying such a move would be “profoundly irresponsible under these circumstances.” He wrote: “At best, it would create chaos and confusion—at worst, catastrophe!” Leon said: “I am not going to put people's live at risk with a somewhat knee-jerk, blanket TRO.”
The lawyers in the cases will return to Leon's courtroom in Washington, just down the street from the U.S. Capitol, on Jan. 31. The judge wants to hear argument to a pending request for a preliminary injunction. Whether the government is still shutdown then is anyone's guess.
Leon's written order is posted in full below:
Read more:
Shutdown Meltdown: What It Means for Law Firms and the Courts
Law Firms Face 'Uncharted Waters' as Shutdown Grinds Some Practices to a Halt
DC Circuit Judges Feud, and New Suits Pile Up, as Shutdown Persists
Government Shutdown Leaves Law Student Externs Scrambling
DC Circuit Won't Delay Net Neutrality Arguments During Trump's Shutdown
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill GOP-Led Senate, House Move to Repeal Biden's Late Regulations as Law Provides?
US Supreme Court Weighs Federal Agencies' Duty Under National Environmental Policy Act
FDA Defends Rejection of Vape-Flavor Applications Before Sympathetic Supreme Court
'Nuclear Option'?: Eli Lilly Taps Big Law Firms in Federal Drug Pricing Dispute
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace
- 2Failure to Adequately Inform Patients
- 3'FTX' One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
- 4Gen AI Legal Contract Startup Ivo Announces $16 Million Series A Funding Round
- 5DOJ's Flawed Thinking in Challenging HPE-Juniper Merger
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250