Fourth Quarter Lobbying Results Show Brownstein Gaining Ground on Akin Gump
Akin Gump reported $37.6 million in total annual lobbying revenue for 2018, down slightly from 2017, while Brownstein nearly matched Akin's fourth quarter revenues to end the year with $31.6 million.
January 22, 2019 at 02:27 PM
4 minute read
The revenue gap between the top federal lobbying firms is narrowing, according to the firms' fourth-quarter results announced Tuesday.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld said Tuesday it raked in $9.67 million in 2018's final quarter, while Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck said it brought in $9 million.
Akin Gump has led the rankings of top lobbying firms as measured by revenue since overtaking Squire Patton Boggs in 2014, while Brownstein skipped ahead of Squire in 2015, according to data collected by OpenSecrets. The two firms have placed atop the rankings of top lobbying firms ever since, with Akin Gump in the lead but Brownstein following ever closer, separated by approximately $700,000 in 2018's third quarter.
Tuesday marks the due date for registered lobbyists firms to report fourth quarter revenues under the Lobbying Disclosure Act. Brownstein's filing shows it outperforming its previous year's results, while Akin Gump saw a decline. Brownstein said its total federal lobbying revenues reached $31,610,000 in 2018, up approximately 8 percent year over year from 2017. Akin Gump recorded $37,624,000 in total annual lobbying revenue for 2018, which is down from $38,984,000 in 2017 but above its 2016 results.
“Our strong fourth quarter and year-over-year performance stems from our tremendous bipartisan and bicameral team,” said Marc Lampkin, Brownstein government relations department chair, in a statement. “We anticipate continued growth and success during the new Congress with recent additions to our outstanding group of public policy professionals.”
Brownstein said earlier this month it elected Rich Benenson to replace Adam Agron as managing partner of the firm, with Benenson set to take leadership July 1. Last year Greg Brower, the FBI's former top congressional liaison, moved to Brownstein in D.C. and Las Vegas.
Akin Gump's $9.67 million 2018 fourth-quarter revenue is down from $10,024,000 in 2017, but above its 2016 fourth quarter revenue results. The firm blamed the dip in part on the midterm elections and said the new year has been busy so far.
“Despite it being an election year—when activity tends to slow down a bit—2018 ended up being a very strong year for us, and we were able to close on a high note,” said Brian Pomper, co-head of the firm's public law and policy practice. “And in spite of the shutdown, 2019 has been off to a strong start as well. This is a reflection of our bipartisan strength, and especially our depth on the Democratic side. With a Democratic-controlled House now seated, I think there are real opportunities for bipartisan legislation on issues such as privacy, infrastructure and trade, and I'm optimistic as I look ahead to the rest of the year.”
Akin Gump is making changes in 2019 to help its lobbyists stay closer to the action on the Hill. While the firm is moving a few blocks within Washington's DuPont Circle neighborhood, it also plans to utilize satellite space near the Hill on the 700-block of Pennsylvania Avenue SE.
Rounding out the top five earning federal lobby shops in 2017, after Akin Gump and Brownstein, were Squire Patton Boggs, BGR Group and Holland & Knight. Tuesday's fourth quarter 2018 figures showed BGR Group trailing the top two again, but edging ahead of Squire and Holland & Knight.
BGR Group told The National Law Journal it garnered $6.7 million in 2018's fourth quarter, bringing its full revenues for 2018 to $27.1 million, up from $23.6 million from the prior year.
Holland & Knight said it drew $5.87 in 2018's fourth quarter, yielding $24,529,000 for all of 2018. In 2017, Holland & Knight recorded total revenues of $22,375,000.
Squire said it brought in $5,599,500 in the fourth quarter, bringing its full-year haul to $24,274,000 for 2018. Squire recorded slightly less revenue than in 2017, when it brought in $24,330,000.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
GOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Trying a Case for Abu Ghraib Detainees Two Decades After Abuse
- 2The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 3The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 4The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 5A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250