Grassley Aide Mike Davis Reflects on Combative Kavanaugh Confirmation
“I'm not going to apologize for anything,” says Mike Davis, former chief counsel for nominations at the Senate Judiciary Committee. “We did the right thing by getting Justice Kavanaugh confirmed.”
January 24, 2019 at 10:22 AM
5 minute read
Two years ago, Michael Davis left his Denver solo practice to help Neil Gorsuch get confirmed as a Supreme Court justice. Davis had clerked for Gorsuch at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.
Davis went on to clerk for Gorsuch again on the high court and then signed on with Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, as chief nominations counsel, playing a key role in an even more contentious Supreme Court nomination, this time for Brett Kavanaugh.
Davis left the position last week after Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, took the reins of the Senate Judiciary Committee and hired his own nominations counsel: Andrew Ferguson, formerly a clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas.
In a wide-ranging interview since leaving Capitol Hill, Davis reflected on what he described as his “wild two years-plus” in Washington.
Davis said he had no regrets for his unflinching handling of the Kavanaugh nomination. When the allegations of sexual abuse surfaced against Kavanaugh last September, Davis was criticized for tweeting that the committee was “unfazed and determined” to confirm Kavanaugh—a stance that suggested to some that accuser Christine Blasey Ford would not get a fair hearing.
“I'm not going to apologize for anything,” Davis said. “We did the right thing by getting Justice Kavanaugh confirmed.” Ford still stands by her sworn testimony before the Judiciary Committee.
Davis also asserted that “Senate Democrats and their outside liberal allies really overplayed their hand, and it backfired on them, to mix metaphors.”
Looking ahead, Davis said he would help the Trump administration continue its record-breaking success filling vacancies on the federal bench. Trump and Senate Republicans successfully confirmed 53 district court judges, 30 circuit court judges and two Supreme Court justices during his first term in office, more than any recent president in modern history. The Trump administration is moving forward quickly, having renominated 51 picks.
What follows are highlights from The National Law Journal's interview with Davis:
>> 'We were not going to let this good man get destroyed': “Justice Kavanaugh was the most qualified Supreme Court nominee in our history. He had unquestionably high character, as evidenced by the fact that he went through six full field background investigations over a 25-year period. We were not going to let this good man get destroyed during this process based upon allegations that ended up not to pan out.”
>> 'We called everyone. We tracked down every lead': “We had over 20 people, trying to track down all these allegations. Chairman Grassley brought on his world-renowned oversight team to help out with this effort. Their oversight team and the nominations team tracked down every lead. We called everyone. We tracked down every lead and then we had numerous other allegations that popped up, and they all ended up not panning out at all.”
>> 'I will stay involved in the judicial fight.' “I do not intend to hang up my gloves in the judicial fight, and I will stay involved in the judicial fight from the outside. I'm talking to different law firms. I'm in serious discussion with one particular law firm, and we'll see. I was on my own for five years before I helped Justice Gorsuch get set up on the Supreme Court, and it was the best five years of my life, professionally.”
>> Judicial nominations is essentially all the Senate can do now on its own. “The next two years, just about the only thing that's going to happen in Washington is the confirmation of federal judges. With the Democrats controlling the House, the confirmation of federal judges is really going to be the only thing that counts.”
>> 'Graham's going to do a great job.' “There was no chance I was staying beyond the 115th Congress, and I was happy to help Chairman Graham and his team through the transition. Chairman Graham's going to do a great job. He'll continue to push the judges, like Chairman Grassley did.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDemocrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
4 minute readHolland & Knight, Akin, Crowell, Barnes and Day Pitney Add to DC Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1$83M Verdict After $100K Demand Rejected in Henry County
- 2Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
- 3How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 5Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250