SEC Chair Jay Clayton's Haul From Sullivan & Cromwell Inches Up (Another $1.7M)
Clayton's latest financial disclosure, which had been available in December, was released Monday on the reopening of the federal government.
January 28, 2019 at 06:56 PM
6 minute read
As the Trump administration's pick to lead the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Jay Clayton stood out as one of the wealthiest nominees when he reported $7.6 million in partnership income from the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, where he represented an array of prominent companies and Wall Street banks.
But that eye-popping figure, which included income for legal services provided in the 12 months preceding his nomination, did not capture everything Clayton made in his final full year as a Sullivan & Cromwell partner. In 2017, Clayton received an additional $1.7 million, according to a newly released annual financial disclosure.
The income fits the overall portrait of compensation schemes at Sullivan & Cromwell, one of the wealthiest Wall Street firms. Sullivan & Cromwell ranked fifth last year in The American Lawyer ranking of Am Law 100 firms by profits per equity partner. The firm's profits per equity partner in 2017 were identified as $4.2 million.
Clayton was nominated in January 2017 to lead the SEC, but he didn't leave the firm until his confirmation that May. He had been a partner at the New York-based firm since 2001. Clayton's latest financial disclosure, which had been available in December, was released Monday on the reopening of the federal government.
Clayton said in the disclosure: “Pursuant to the firm's partnership agreement, and before I assumed the duties of the position of SEC chairman, I received a refund of my capital account and a pro rata partnership share based on the value of my partnership interests for services performed in 2017.”
A source familiar with Clayton's compensation said the newly reported earnings stemmed from work completed in 2016 and that his practice at Sullivan & Cromwell was effectively dormant in early 2017 after the White House announced his nomination.
In his first financial disclosure, filed in January 2017 after he was nominated to lead the SEC, Clayton revealed an elite client list that included Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Volkswagen, The Weinstein Co. and LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman. (The disclosure also noted nine clients—four individuals and five corporations—whose identities were kept confidential.)
Publicly available ethics documents indicated that Clayton, as of July 2017, had recused from particular matters at the SEC involving a personal or imputed financial interest. Clayton also said in an ethics filing that he had recused from particular matters that involved Sullivan & Cromwell and former clients.
Clayton's deep white-collar ties, combined with his past questioning of the fairness of corporate penalties, raised questions during his confirmation proceedings about how aggressively the SEC would police markets under his watch.
In November, a review by the New York Times showed a decline in the SEC's enforcement activity during the first 20 months of the Trump administration. Comparing that period to the final 20 months of the Obama presidency, the Times concluded that the disgorgement and financial penalties ordered by the SEC fell by 62 percent.
The SEC disputed the report's methodology as “deeply flawed.” “As the thorough analysis in our annual report makes clear, the division of enforcement's performance, effectiveness and activity level during our tenure compares favorably with any period in the commission's history,” the SEC's enforcement directors said.
The law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, long a big player in the white-collar space, said in a report this month that the SEC's enforcement activity rebounded in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, 2018, with the agency filing 490 new actions. The SEC had filed 446 stand-alone enforcement actions in the fiscal year that ended in September 2017, a more than 18 percent drop from the nearly 550 actions filed in the previous fiscal year. “The (fiscal) year-end rush appeared intended to blunt some of the criticism of the Enforcement Division's productivity in the new administration,” the report concluded.
Under Clayton's leadership, the enforcement division has prioritized cases involving so-called “Main Street” or “retail” investors while also keeping watch over a relatively new front: the digital currency market. At the end of 2018, the SEC brought a string of cases over unregistered initial coin offerings, or ICOs, and reached settlements with the professional boxer Floyd Mayweather and DJ Khaled over allegations that they promoted coin offerings without disclosing that they had been paid to do so.
In congressional testimony and public remarks, Clayton has also stressed the SEC's efforts with cybersecurity—including guidance the agency has issued for disclosing cyber incidents.
Last year, the SEC charged a former top executive at Equifax with selling off shares in the company based on inside information about a breach that exposed the personal information of nearly 150 million Americans. And earlier this month, the SEC charged a Ukrainian hacker and six traders with accessing the agency's EDGAR system for regulatory filings to obtain nonpublic information and trade on it.
|Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTopping Big Law, Litigation Firm the Latest to Dole Out Above-Market Bonuses
3 minute readWilkinson Stekloff Tops Big Law, Doles Out 150% Above-Market Bonuses
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: 'Attorney's Eyes Only' Protective Order Denied; Good Cause Not Demonstrated
- 2The Crypto Guys Seem to Like Paul Atkins as a New SEC Commissioner, but Will He Be Good for the Securities Industry?
- 3Lawsuits, AI Accuracy and Debt: Legal Tech Companies that Ran Into Trouble in 2024
- 4Preemptive Litigation: A Potential Approach for a Precise Situation
- 5Paxton's 2024 Agenda: Immigration, Climate, Transgender Issues, Social Media, Abortion, Elections
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250