On Judicial Nominations, Trump White House—Again—Spurns Democrats
The uncertainty over three Ninth Circuit court openings was settled Wednesday evening when the Trump White House announced its intended nominees for the appeals court.
January 31, 2019 at 05:17 PM
4 minute read
The uncertainty over three Ninth Circuit court openings was settled Wednesday evening when the Trump White House announced its intended nominees for the appeals court.
But the announcement, naming lawyers Kenneth Lee, Daniel Collins and Daniel Bress to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, also laid bare the continued beef over judicial nominations between the Trump administration and Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Kamala Harris, the home state senators for the vacancies.
The announcement came after discussions appeared to collapse between the two Democratic senators and the White House over the six openings for California judicial seats. The White House often consults home state senators for circuit and district court nominations, including working with Democratic lawmakers to find agreeable candidates.
Feinstein and Harris had opposed the White House's previous batch of nominees, which included Lee, Collins and assistant U.S. attorney Patrick Bumatay. The lawmakers were optimistic about negotiations over picks after the White House noticeably left several names off its list of re-nominations in early January.
Feinstein had urged a compromise package on nominations, which would include nominating one of the White House's preferred picks, one of their preferred picks, and a compromise pick, in October and November letters to White House counsel Pat Cipollone.
That appeared to be largely for naught Wednesday when Feinstein and Harris denounced the circuit nominations and said they were “deeply disappointed” by the result. The White House's move came as conservatives mounted a pressure campaign on the Trump administration to avoid concessions to Democrats. A Wall Street Journal editorial said any concession to the Democrats would be “political weakness.”
The picks themselves weren't aware of their fate. The White House only notified lawyers of their nominations yesterday, according to a source familiar with the situation.
Wednesday's list moved Bumatay, a Filipino-American and an out gay male, to a district court nomination in the Southern District of California. The all-male nominations list also renominated Stanley Blumenfeld, Jeremy Rosen and Mark Scarsi to seats in the Central District of California.
It's not clear whether Feinstein and Harris will return a blue slip for Bumatay. Sen. Lindsey Graham has previously said he would honor the blue slip tradition for district court picks, but not circuit court picks. Bumatay did not return a request for comment.
Both senators had staunchly opposed his nomination to the Ninth Circuit, but Wednesday's joint statement only acknowledged that the senators have had “productive conversations” with the White House on district court nominations.
Bress' nomination did not come out of left field. The Kirkland & Ellis partner has previously interviewed with Feinstein's judicial selection committees, according to a release. An August 2017 Above the Law article identified Bress as interviewing for a Ninth Circuit seat with the White House.
On Wednesday, Feinstein and Harris in a joint statement said they raised “concerns” about Bress, noting that he is based in Washington, D.C., is young and lacks judicial experience.
His nomination also means two former clerks for Justice Antonin Scalia could soon join the Ninth Circuit. Both Bress and Collins clerked for the late justice.
Collins is a Los Angeles-based partner at Munger, Tolles & Olson. He previously served as an associate deputy attorney general and held stints as an assistant U.S. attorney in the Central District of California and as an attorney adviser at the DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel. Feinstein and Harris said Thursday that concerns about “his temperament and rigidity were raised during his vetting,” relating to litigation positions he's taken in the past.
Lee, a Los Angeles-based partner at Jenner & Block, was previously an associate counsel under the George W. Bush White House. Feinstein and Harris said Thursday they opposed his nomination in part because he did not disclose “controversial writings” to their staff. The senators said the writings “outlined extreme views on a number of important issues like affirmative action and voting rights.”
Graham, who chairs the judiciary committee, said in a statement Thursday he was “very supportive” of the Ninth Circuit nominees. “These are highly qualified nominees and I am hopeful they will receive wide bipartisan support.”
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readWhere May Vacancies for Trump Arise? These GOP-Appointed Circuit Judges Qualify for Senior Status
'Even Playing Field?' Wiley Rein Intervenes in Federal Election Campaign Spending Row
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250