Wilkinson Walsh Representing Justin Fairfax as Accuser Describes Alleged Assault
As detailed assault allegations against the lieutenant governor throw Virginia politics into further turmoil, the law firms on either side are reprising their roles in the Brett Kavanaugh controversy.
February 06, 2019 at 07:21 PM
4 minute read
With both sides now publicly represented by high-profile Washington, D.C., law firms, Justin Fairfax's accuser came forward Wednesday with a detailed account of the alleged sexual assault that has become one of a series of scandals to roil Virginia politics in recent days.
Vanessa Tyson, an associate professor of politics at Scripps College in California, alleges that Fairfax, the state's lieutenant governor and a partner at Morrison & Foerster, forced her into oral sex during the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston.
“What began as consensual kissing quickly turned into a sexual assault,” Tyson said in a lengthy statement issued on the letterhead of her law firm, Katz, Marshall & Banks. “I cannot believe, given my obvious distress, that Mr. Fairfax thought this forced sexual act was consensual. To be very clear, I did not want to engage in oral sex with Mr. Fairfax and I never gave any form of consent.”
Also on Wednesday, Rakesh Kilaru, a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz, confirmed that he is representing Fairfax, who has strongly denied the assault and threatened legal action over the accusations.
“I and my firm were retained by the Lieutenant Governor in January 2018 with respect to a possible story in a media publication and we are currently representing him as well,” Kilaru, a former associate counsel in the Office of White House Counsel under President Barack Obama, wrote in an email confirming the representation.
The Wilkinson and Katz firms found themselves on opposite sides of a national political scandal involving alleged sexual misconduct just last fall, when then-U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh turned to Beth Wilkinson and his most high profile accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, turned to Debra Katz.
Katz's firm has declined to comment on Tyson's accusations. Tyson, in her statement, described first coming forward with her account of the alleged assault to The Washington Post after Fairfax was elected in November 2017, and she rejected Fairfax's depiction of the newspaper's reasons for not running her story.
“Since October 2017 when I first began telling friends about the assault, I have never wavered in my account because I am telling the truth,” Tyson said. “I have no political motive. I am a proud Democrat. My only motive in speaking now is to refute Mr. Fairfax's falsehoods and aspersions of my character, and to provide what I believe is important information for Virginians to have as they make critical decisions that involve Mr. Fairfax.”
Fairfax is first-in-line to run the Commonwealth of Virginia, should Gov. Ralph Northam resign over his use of blackface before he launched his political career. Virginia Attorney General Mark Herring, next in line for governor after Northam and Fairfax, admitted Wednesday that he too wore blackface.
In a statement rejecting Tyson's claims earlier this week, Fairfax that said he “will take appropriate legal action against those attempting to spread this defamatory and false allegation.” While Fairfax did not identify a target of such legal action, Tyson's statement said Fairfax had “threatened litigation.”
In a statement Wednesday, Fairfax called the accusation “surprising and hurtful” and described his encounter with Tyson as consensual.
Tyson's statement noted that it was the only comment she and her legal team would make on the alleged assault.
|Read More
MoFo's Justin Fairfax, Suddenly on Deck for VA Governor, Blasts Assault Allegations
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNelson Mullins, Greenberg Traurig, Jones Day Have Established Themselves As Biggest Outsiders in Atlanta Legal Market
7 minute readShareholder Activists Poised to Pounce in 2025. Is Your Board Ready?
GOP Trifecta in Washington Could Put Litigation Finance Industry Under Pressure
NLRB Bans 'Captive Audience' Meetings, Yanking Away Platform Employers Used to Combat Unionizing
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-61
- 2Decision of the Day: School District's Probe Was a 'Sham'; Title IX Administrator Showed Sex-Based Bias
- 3US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 4Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 5McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250