NY AG James Rejects View That Trump Foundation Suit Is Politically Motivated
New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, is pushing back against allegations by attorneys for President Donald Trump that “antipathy and animus” toward the Republican president is the motivation behind the AG's lawsuit regarding Trump's charitable organization.
February 11, 2019 at 04:09 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
New York Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, is pushing back against allegations by attorneys for President Donald Trump that “antipathy and animus” toward the Republican president is the motivation behind the AG's lawsuit regarding Trump's charitable organization.
James' predecessor Barbara Underwood, who has returned to her previous role as New York's solicitor general, filed the suit in June, just weeks after former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, also a Democrat, resigned in disgrace amid allegations that he physically abused romantic partners.
Alan Futerfas, who represents the Trump Foundation in the suit, has previously said the suit is motivated by political bias; on Feb. 8, he reiterated those claims and took them further to include James, a former New York City public advocate who Futerfas said ran an “anti-Trump campaign” last year for AG.
Citing a December article published in The New York Times under the headline “N.Y.'s New Attorney General Is Targeting Trump. Will Judges See a 'Political Vendetta?'” Trump's attorneys note that James has called Trump an “illegitimate president” and that she was driven to run for AG “about that man in the White House who can't go a day without threatening our fundamental rights.”
Marc Mukasey, whom Trump reportedly considered for nomination as a U.S. Attorney in New York, also signed on to the answer. According to someone with knowledge of Mukasey's professional plans, he left Greenberg Traurig last month and is in the process of forming a new firm that will focus on trial work.
On Monday, James fired back at the attorneys and said that the judge in the case will make decisions based on the facts and the law, “not my personal opinion.”
“As the attorney general, I follow the facts and evidence wherever it leads, and I don't believe I lose my First Amendment rights as an attorney general,” James told reporters. “So we need to make sure we investigate all cases, whether it involves the Trump Foundation or any other case in the Office of the Attorney General, and whatever that case unfolds, we will follow the law and bring it to justice on behalf of New York.”
In the lawsuit, filed in Manhattan Supreme Court, the AG's office alleges that Trump used his charitable organization to fund his 2016 presidential campaign, as well as pay down some of his legal obligations, promote his brand, and take care of some personal expenses.
It is not clear if the Trump legal team's allegations of political bias against James or her two predecessors will get anywhere with Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla, who presides over the Trump Foundation case.
In November, the judge denied a motion to dismiss the suit, finding that claims of political bias were not enough to prevent the case from moving forward. Trump's attorneys are appealing Scarpulla's ruling to the Appellate Division, First Department.
Trump and his attorneys reached an agreement in December for dissolution of the Trump Foundation, but that deal does not affect the course of the lawsuit, in which the AG's office seeks $2.8 million in restitution and a prohibition on Trump and his children from serving on any nonprofit boards for a period of years.
Dan M. Clark contributed to this article.
Read more:
Incoming NY AG James Vows to Press Cases Against Trump, White House
Trump Foundation Agrees to Dissolve Under Stipulation With NY AG
Manhattan Justice Rejects Motion to Dismiss Trump Foundation Lawsuit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Something Else Is Coming': DOGE Established, but With Limited Scope
Supreme Court Considers Reviving Lawsuit Over Fatal Traffic Stop Shooting
US DOJ Threatens to Prosecute Local Officials Who Don't Aid Immigration Enforcement
3 minute readUS Judge Cannon Blocks DOJ From Releasing Final Report in Trump Documents Probe
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250